Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
140
Grants
19
Denials
121
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
35.5%
322 / 908
Total decisions
908
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
35.5%
Grants: 322
Denial rate
64.5%
Denials: 586
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Joseph C. Scott as an immigration judge in June 2020. Judge Scott earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1999 from Rutgers College and a Juris Doctor in 2003 from Rutgers School of Law – Newark. From 2012 to 2020, he served as an assistant chiefcounsel, Office of Chief Counsel (OCC), Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA),Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Philadelphia. From 2009 to 2012, he served as an associate legal advisor, National Security Law Section, OPLA, ICE, DHS, in the District of Columbia. From 2007 to 2009, he served as anassistant chief counsel, OCC, OPLA, ICE, DHS, in Los Angeles. From 2005 to 2006, he was anassociate attorney with Farmer Case and Fedor, in San Diego. Judge Scott is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Joseph C Scott.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 140 | 19 | 121 | 13.6% | 86.4% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 92 | 7 | 85 | 7.6% | 92.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 92 | 18 | 74 | 19.6% | 80.4% | View details | |
Belize Sufficient sample | 43 | 40 | 3 | 93.0% | 7.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 38 | 9 | 29 | 23.7% | 76.3% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 36 | 25 | 11 | 69.4% | 30.6% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 35 | 3 | 32 | 8.6% | 91.4% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 34 | 3 | 31 | 8.8% | 91.2% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Sufficient sample | 30 | 19 | 11 | 63.3% | 36.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 28 | 16 | 12 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 28 | 7 | 21 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 26 | 11 | 15 | 42.3% | 57.7% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 22 | 21 | 1 | 95.5% | 4.5% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 19 | 11 | 8 | 57.9% | 42.1% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 13 | 10 | 3 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 13 | 9 | 4 | 69.2% | 30.8% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details |
Total decisions
140
Grants
19
Denials
121
Total decisions
92
Grants
7
Denials
85
Total decisions
92
Grants
18
Denials
74
Total decisions
43
Grants
40
Denials
3
Total decisions
38
Grants
9
Denials
29
Total decisions
36
Grants
25
Denials
11
Total decisions
35
Grants
3
Denials
32
Total decisions
34
Grants
3
Denials
31
Total decisions
30
Grants
19
Denials
11
Total decisions
29
Grants
0
Denials
29
Total decisions
28
Grants
16
Denials
12
Total decisions
28
Grants
7
Denials
21
Total decisions
26
Grants
11
Denials
15
Total decisions
22
Grants
21
Denials
1
Total decisions
19
Grants
11
Denials
8
Total decisions
18
Grants
6
Denials
12
Total decisions
14
Grants
1
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
10
Denials
3
Total decisions
13
Grants
9
Denials
4
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.