Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
152
Grants
131
Denials
21
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
49.1%
477 / 972
Total decisions
972
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
49.1%
Grants: 477
Denial rate
50.9%
Denials: 495
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Former Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Lauren T. Farber to begin hearing cases in April 2017. Judge Farber earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1999 from Washington University in St. Louis and a Juris Doctor in 2003 from the American University Washington College of Law. From 2010 through 2017, she served as a senior attorney for the Office of the Chief Counsel (OCC), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in New York, N.Y. From 2003 to 2010, she served as an assistant chief counsel for OCC, ICE, DHS. Judge Farber is a member of the New York and New Jersey State Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Lauren T Farber.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 152 | 131 | 21 | 86.2% | 13.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 99 | 23 | 76 | 23.2% | 76.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 71 | 17 | 54 | 23.9% | 76.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 67 | 27 | 40 | 40.3% | 59.7% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 65 | 22 | 43 | 33.8% | 66.2% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 49 | 7 | 42 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 38 | 1 | 37 | 2.6% | 97.4% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 35 | 30 | 5 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 31 | 6 | 25 | 19.4% | 80.6% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 30 | 21 | 9 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 25 | 9 | 16 | 36.0% | 64.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 23 | 20 | 3 | 87.0% | 13.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 23 | 23 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 19 | 15 | 4 | 78.9% | 21.1% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 78.6% | View details | |
Tristan da Cunha Moderate sample | 14 | 9 | 5 | 64.3% | 35.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Moderate sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details |
Total decisions
152
Grants
131
Denials
21
Total decisions
99
Grants
23
Denials
76
Total decisions
71
Grants
17
Denials
54
Total decisions
67
Grants
27
Denials
40
Total decisions
65
Grants
22
Denials
43
Total decisions
49
Grants
7
Denials
42
Total decisions
38
Grants
1
Denials
37
Total decisions
35
Grants
30
Denials
5
Total decisions
31
Grants
6
Denials
25
Total decisions
30
Grants
21
Denials
9
Total decisions
25
Grants
9
Denials
16
Total decisions
23
Grants
20
Denials
3
Total decisions
23
Grants
23
Denials
0
Total decisions
19
Grants
15
Denials
4
Total decisions
14
Grants
3
Denials
11
Total decisions
14
Grants
9
Denials
5
Total decisions
13
Grants
3
Denials
10
Total decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Total decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Total decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.