Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
357
Grants
79
Denials
278
Grant rate: 22.1%Denial rate: 77.9%
Immigration judge
John B Carle
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
35.6%
718 / 2014
Total decisions
2014
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
35.6%
Grants: 718
Denial rate
64.3%
Denials: 1296
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed John B. Carle to begin hearing cases in June 2016. Judge Carle earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1990 from the State University of New York at Binghamton and a Juris Doctor in 1993 from the State University of New York at Buffalo Law School. From 2007 to May 2016, Judge Carle served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security. From 2000 through 2007, Judge Carle served as an assistant district attorney for the City of Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office. From 1995 through 2000, Judge Carle served as an assistant district attorney for the Erie County District Attorney’s Office, in Buffalo, N.Y. From 1993 through 1995, Judge Carle served as an associate attorney for Magner, Love & Morris PC, in Buffalo, N.Y. In 2013, Judge Carle joined the faculty of the Villanova University School of Law where he serves as an adjunct professor. Judge Carle is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants718 / 2014
Denials1296 / 2014
Other relief0 / 2014
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to John B Carle.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 357 | 79 | 278 | 22.1% | 77.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 319 | 72 | 247 | 22.6% | 77.4% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 223 | 16 | 207 | 7.2% | 92.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 157 | 22 | 135 | 14.0% | 86.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 128 | 16 | 112 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Belize Sufficient sample | 66 | 64 | 2 | 97.0% | 3.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 63 | 57 | 6 | 90.5% | 9.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 55 | 7 | 48 | 12.7% | 87.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 47 | 28 | 19 | 59.6% | 40.4% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Sufficient sample | 42 | 26 | 16 | 61.9% | 38.1% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 34 | 3 | 31 | 8.8% | 91.2% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 31 | 14 | 17 | 45.2% | 54.8% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 31 | 23 | 8 | 74.2% | 25.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 24 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 24 | 10 | 14 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 23 | 19 | 4 | 82.6% | 17.4% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 22 | 16 | 6 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Moderate sample | 19 | 18 | 1 | 94.7% | 5.3% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 19 | 16 | 3 | 84.2% | 15.8% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details |
View details
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
319
Grants
72
Denials
247
Grant rate: 22.6%Denial rate: 77.4%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
223
Grants
16
Denials
207
Grant rate: 7.2%Denial rate: 92.8%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
157
Grants
22
Denials
135
Grant rate: 14.0%Denial rate: 86.0%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
128
Grants
16
Denials
112
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Belize
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
66
Grants
64
Denials
2
Grant rate: 97.0%Denial rate: 3.0%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
63
Grants
57
Denials
6
Grant rate: 90.5%Denial rate: 9.5%
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
7
Denials
48
Grant rate: 12.7%Denial rate: 87.3%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
28
Denials
19
Grant rate: 59.6%Denial rate: 40.4%
Uzbekistan
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
26
Denials
16
Grant rate: 61.9%Denial rate: 38.1%
Haiti
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
3
Denials
31
Grant rate: 8.8%Denial rate: 91.2%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
14
Denials
17
Grant rate: 45.2%Denial rate: 54.8%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
23
Denials
8
Grant rate: 74.2%Denial rate: 25.8%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
4
Denials
20
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
10
Denials
14
Grant rate: 41.7%Denial rate: 58.3%
Georgia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
19
Denials
4
Grant rate: 82.6%Denial rate: 17.4%
Pakistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
16
Denials
6
Grant rate: 72.7%Denial rate: 27.3%
Kyrgyzstan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
18
Denials
1
Grant rate: 94.7%Denial rate: 5.3%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
16
Denials
3
Grant rate: 84.2%Denial rate: 15.8%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
8
Denials
10
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Craig De Bernardis
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.0%
- Denial Rate
- 65.0%
Antonio Capistrano
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.3%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Patrick J Ehlers
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 49.6%
- Denial Rate
- 50.4%
Lauren T Farber
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 49.1%
- Denial Rate
- 50.9%
Donald V. Ferlise
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 13.0%
- Denial Rate
- 87.0%
Melissa Fox
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 12.4%
- Denial Rate
- 87.6%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.