Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
370
Grants
5
Denials
365
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
28.9%
386 / 1338
Total decisions
1338
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
28.9%
Grants: 386
Denial rate
71.2%
Denials: 952
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Former Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Paul M. Habich to begin hearing cases in April 2017. Judge Habich earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2004 from The University of Wisconsin–Madison and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from the Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. From June 2009 to March 2017, he served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security. From 2008 to 2009, he was an associate attorney with the law firm Lathrop & Clark LLP, in Madison, Wis. From 1996 through 2000, he served in the U.S. Marine Corps. Judge Habich is a member of the State Bar of Wisconsin.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Paul M Habich.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 370 | 5 | 365 | 1.4% | 98.6% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 184 | 144 | 40 | 78.3% | 21.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 143 | 77 | 66 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 127 | 3 | 124 | 2.4% | 97.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 65 | 10 | 55 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 58 | 2 | 56 | 3.4% | 96.6% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 51 | 24 | 27 | 47.1% | 52.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 50 | 4 | 46 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 32 | 23 | 9 | 71.9% | 28.1% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 29 | 21 | 8 | 72.4% | 27.6% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 26 | 17 | 9 | 65.4% | 34.6% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 18 | 1 | 17 | 5.6% | 94.4% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 12 | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details |
Total decisions
370
Grants
5
Denials
365
Total decisions
184
Grants
144
Denials
40
Total decisions
143
Grants
77
Denials
66
Total decisions
127
Grants
3
Denials
124
Total decisions
65
Grants
10
Denials
55
Total decisions
58
Grants
2
Denials
56
Total decisions
51
Grants
24
Denials
27
Total decisions
50
Grants
4
Denials
46
Total decisions
32
Grants
23
Denials
9
Total decisions
29
Grants
21
Denials
8
Total decisions
27
Grants
0
Denials
27
Total decisions
26
Grants
17
Denials
9
Total decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Total decisions
18
Grants
1
Denials
17
Total decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
11
Denials
1
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.