Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
480
Grants
1
Denials
479
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
17.4%
320 / 1838
Total decisions
1838
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
17.4%
Grants: 320
Denial rate
82.6%
Denials: 1518
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed John W. Cortes to begin hearingcases in March 2019. Judge Cortes earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1999 from the City University of New York at Brooklyn College and a Juris Doctor in 2002 at the New York Law School. From 2003 to 2018, he served as an assistant district attorney for the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, and from 2013 to 2018, he served as a principal assistant district attorney forthe same court. Judge Cortes is a member of the State Bar of Arizona and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to John W Cortes.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 480 | 1 | 479 | 0.2% | 99.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 240 | 8 | 232 | 3.3% | 96.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 170 | 59 | 111 | 34.7% | 65.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 154 | 14 | 140 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 135 | 63 | 72 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 134 | 8 | 126 | 6.0% | 94.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 99 | 63 | 36 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 92 | 4 | 88 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 44 | 15 | 29 | 34.1% | 65.9% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 41 | 8 | 33 | 19.5% | 80.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 30 | 3 | 27 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 21 | 9 | 12 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 18 | 7 | 11 | 38.9% | 61.1% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 16 | 14 | 2 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 13 | 4 | 9 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
480
Grants
1
Denials
479
Total decisions
240
Grants
8
Denials
232
Total decisions
170
Grants
59
Denials
111
Total decisions
154
Grants
14
Denials
140
Total decisions
135
Grants
63
Denials
72
Total decisions
134
Grants
8
Denials
126
Total decisions
99
Grants
63
Denials
36
Total decisions
92
Grants
4
Denials
88
Total decisions
44
Grants
15
Denials
29
Total decisions
41
Grants
8
Denials
33
Total decisions
30
Grants
3
Denials
27
Total decisions
21
Grants
9
Denials
12
Total decisions
18
Grants
7
Denials
11
Total decisions
18
Grants
0
Denials
18
Total decisions
16
Grants
14
Denials
2
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
13
Grants
4
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.