Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
315
Grants
254
Denials
61
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
42.9%
590 / 1375
Total decisions
1375
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
42.9%
Grants: 590
Denial rate
57.1%
Denials: 785
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Freerks was appointed as an Immigration Judge in September 1994. Judge Freerks received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Northwestern College in 1977, and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Iowa College of Law in 1980. Prior to becoming an Immigration Judge, he worked as a staff attorney from 1991 to 1994 for the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project. From 1989 to 1991, Judge Freerks worked as a staff attorney for Border Association for Refugees from Central America in Edinburg, Texas. Judge Freerks worked as a staff attorney in 1991 for the Methodist Legal Ministries in Brownsville, Texas. He is a member of the Texas Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to LaMonte S Freerks.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 315 | 254 | 61 | 80.6% | 19.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 195 | 22 | 173 | 11.3% | 88.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 134 | 19 | 115 | 14.2% | 85.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 108 | 9 | 99 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 75 | 9 | 66 | 12.0% | 88.0% | View details | |
Myanmar (Burma) Sufficient sample | 54 | 45 | 9 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 42 | 13 | 29 | 31.0% | 69.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 27 | 11 | 16 | 40.7% | 59.3% | View details | |
Iraq Moderate sample | 26 | 20 | 6 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 23 | 4 | 19 | 17.4% | 82.6% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 23 | 2 | 21 | 8.7% | 91.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 18 | 10 | 8 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Indonesia Moderate sample | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 17 | 13 | 4 | 76.5% | 23.5% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 15 | 10 | 5 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 14 | 14 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Kenya Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Armenia Moderate sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details |
Total decisions
315
Grants
254
Denials
61
Total decisions
195
Grants
22
Denials
173
Total decisions
134
Grants
19
Denials
115
Total decisions
108
Grants
9
Denials
99
Total decisions
75
Grants
9
Denials
66
Total decisions
54
Grants
45
Denials
9
Total decisions
42
Grants
13
Denials
29
Total decisions
27
Grants
11
Denials
16
Total decisions
26
Grants
20
Denials
6
Total decisions
23
Grants
4
Denials
19
Total decisions
23
Grants
2
Denials
21
Total decisions
18
Grants
10
Denials
8
Total decisions
17
Grants
1
Denials
16
Total decisions
17
Grants
13
Denials
4
Total decisions
15
Grants
10
Denials
5
Total decisions
14
Grants
14
Denials
0
Total decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Total decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Total decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Total decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.