Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
372
Grants
3
Denials
369
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
23.3%
294 / 1264
Total decisions
1264
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
23.3%
Grants: 294
Denial rate
76.7%
Denials: 970
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Jennifer I. Gaz to begin hearing cases in April 2017. Judge Gaz earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1994 from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and a Juris Doctor in 1997 from the De Paul University College of Law. From May 2007 through April 2017, she served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Eloy and Phoenix, Ariz. From November 2003 to April 2007, she was an associate attorney with Wolin, Kelter & Rosen Ltd. From October 2000 to October 2003, she served as staff counsel with the Office of the General Counsel, Chicago Housing Authority. From 1999 to 2000, she was an associate attorney with Fraterrigo, Beranek, Feiereisel & Kasbohm in Chicago. From 1997 to 1999, she was an associate attorney with Eannace, Meade & Associates. Judge Gaz is a member of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jennifer I Gaz.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 372 | 3 | 369 | 0.8% | 99.2% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 156 | 102 | 54 | 65.4% | 34.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 142 | 5 | 137 | 3.5% | 96.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 139 | 60 | 79 | 43.2% | 56.8% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 76 | 3 | 73 | 3.9% | 96.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 64 | 1 | 63 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 59 | 31 | 28 | 52.5% | 47.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 43 | 1 | 42 | 2.3% | 97.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 33 | 21 | 12 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 31 | 4 | 27 | 12.9% | 87.1% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% | 31.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Rwanda Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details |
Total decisions
372
Grants
3
Denials
369
Total decisions
156
Grants
102
Denials
54
Total decisions
142
Grants
5
Denials
137
Total decisions
139
Grants
60
Denials
79
Total decisions
76
Grants
3
Denials
73
Total decisions
64
Grants
1
Denials
63
Total decisions
59
Grants
31
Denials
28
Total decisions
43
Grants
1
Denials
42
Total decisions
33
Grants
21
Denials
12
Total decisions
31
Grants
4
Denials
27
Total decisions
16
Grants
11
Denials
5
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
10
Grants
3
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.