Trimble, Dan
This court
Total Decisions
766
Asylum Grant Rate
9.5%
Denials
90.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
← Back to all courtsactive active active active active active active active active active active active
Immigration Court
Immigration Court Immigration Court
13 judges · GA
- City / state
- Immigration Court, GA
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Average Asylum Grant Rate
9.5%
439 / 4617
Average Asylum Grant Rate
9.5%
Asylum grants
439
Denials
4178
Judges indexed
13
Immigration Court Immigration Court has 13 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
Judges indexed for this court
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
active
Duncan, Randall W.
This court
Total Decisions
520
Asylum Grant Rate
8.7%
Denials
91.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Brown, Bianca, H
This court
Total Decisions
462
Asylum Grant Rate
12.6%
Denials
87.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Fuller, Steven B
This court
Total Decisions
435
Asylum Grant Rate
6.2%
Denials
93.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Arrington, Saundra D.
This court
Total Decisions
328
Asylum Grant Rate
4.3%
Denials
95.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Crofts, James
This court
Total Decisions
320
Asylum Grant Rate
2.2%
Denials
97.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Harness, Jerrica A.
This court
Total Decisions
119
Asylum Grant Rate
8.4%
Denials
91.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Ward, James
This court
Total Decisions
57
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Riner, Phoebe
This court
Total Decisions
47
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Pearson, Kyle A.
This court
Total Decisions
33
Asylum Grant Rate
3.0%
Denials
97.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Stroberg, Kevin D.
This court
Total Decisions
20
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Moderate sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Doolittle, John R., II
This court
Total Decisions
14
Asylum Grant Rate
14.3%
Denials
85.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Moderate sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Owens, Alfredia
This court
Total Decisions
1
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Very small sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HONDURAS | 3.0% | 15 | 492 | 507 |
| EL SALVADOR | 2.0% | 9 | 442 | 451 |
| MEXICO | 1.6% | 7 | 429 | 436 |
| GUATEMALA | 3.5% | 11 | 305 | 316 |
| NICARAGUA | 13.7% | 42 | 265 | 307 |
| CUBA | 14.8% | 40 | 231 | 271 |
| INDIA | 3.5% | 7 | 194 | 201 |
| BANGLADESH | 13.2% | 20 | 132 | 152 |
| CAMEROON | 38.6% | 54 | 86 | 140 |
| CHINA | 15.1% | 21 | 118 | 139 |
| HAITI | 0.8% | 1 | 130 | 131 |
| VENEZUELA | 22.7% | 29 | 99 | 128 |
| NEPAL | 3.8% | 4 | 101 | 105 |
| COLOMBIA | 8.0% | 8 | 92 | 100 |
| ERITREA | 34.8% | 32 | 60 | 92 |
| JAMAICA | 2.4% | 2 | 80 | 82 |
| RUSSIA | 35.0% | 28 | 52 | 80 |
| SOMALIA | 5.8% | 4 | 65 | 69 |
| SRI LANKA | 26.6% | 17 | 47 | 64 |
| GHANA | 5.5% | 3 | 52 | 55 |
| NIGERIA | 7.8% | 4 | 47 | 51 |
| TURKIYE | 37.2% | 16 | 27 | 43 |
| BRAZIL | 2.7% | 1 | 36 | 37 |
| ECUADOR | 0.0% | 0 | 37 | 37 |
| PAKISTAN | 8.3% | 3 | 33 | 36 |
| GUINEA | 15.2% | 5 | 28 | 33 |
| AFGHANISTAN | 13.3% | 4 | 26 | 30 |
| DOMINICAN REPUBLIC | 0.0% | 0 | 27 | 27 |
| ETHIOPIA | 14.8% | 4 | 23 | 27 |
| SENEGAL | 8.7% | 2 | 21 | 23 |
| GEORGIA | 10.5% | 2 | 17 | 19 |
| PERU | 0.0% | 0 | 19 | 19 |
| UZBEKISTAN | 5.3% | 1 | 18 | 19 |
| SYRIA | 16.7% | 3 | 15 | 18 |
| VIETNAM | 11.1% | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| GAMBIA | 5.9% | 1 | 16 | 17 |
| IRAN | 11.8% | 2 | 15 | 17 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 0.0% | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| LIBERIA | 15.4% | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| MAURITANIA | 23.1% | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| SUDAN | 0.0% | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| ALBANIA | 25.0% | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 8.3% | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| EGYPT | 27.3% | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| YEMEN | 9.1% | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 30.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| UKRAINE | 10.0% | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| ANGOLA | 11.1% | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| ARMENIA | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| BAHAMAS | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| CONGO | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| JORDAN | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| BELIZE | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| BOLIVIA | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 14.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| KENYA | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| TOGO | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| BURKINA FASO | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| LEBANON | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| MALI | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| GUYANA | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| IRAQ | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| KOSOVO | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| CHAD | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| CAMBODIA | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| EQUATORIAL GUINEA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| MOROCCO | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| SOUTH KOREA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| THAILAND | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| ALGERIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| AZERBAIJAN | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| BARBADOS | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| BELARUS | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| BENIN | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| COSTA RICA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| CZECH REPUBLIC | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GABON | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GUINEA BISSAU | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| ISRAEL | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE) | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MOLDAVIA (MOLDOVA) | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| NIGER | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| PALESTINE | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| PANAMA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| PHILIPPINES | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| SAUDI ARABIA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| TANZANIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| UGANDA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| BERMUDA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Former Countries | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Former Countries | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GRENADA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| HOLLAND | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| INDONESIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| LIBYA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.