Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
306
Grants
29
Denials
277
Grant rate: 9.5%Denial rate: 90.5%
Immigration judge
Francisco R Prieto
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
30.0%
295 / 983
Total decisions
983
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
30.0%
Grants: 295
Denial rate
70.0%
Denials: 688
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed Francisco R. Prieto to begin hearingcases in March 2019. Judge Prieto earned a Bachelor of Business Administration in 1992 from Hofstra University and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from St. John’s University School of Law. From 2010 to 2019, he served as an assistant chief counsel with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in New York, New York. From 2009 to 2010, he served as an assistant chief counsel ICE, in Miami, Florida. From 2007 to 2009,he served as an assistant attorney general at the New Mexico Attorney General’s Office, in Santa Fe, New Mexico. From 2006 to 2007, he served as an assistant district attorney with the First Judicial District Attorney’s Office, in Santa Fe. From 2004 to 2006, he was an examiner with AIG in New York, New York, and Jersey City, New Jersey. Judge Prieto is a member of the Florida Bar, State Bar of New Mexico and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants295 / 983
Denials688 / 983
Other relief0 / 983
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Francisco R Prieto.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 306 | 29 | 277 | 9.5% | 90.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 81 | 9 | 72 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 76 | 52 | 24 | 68.4% | 31.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 73 | 41 | 32 | 56.2% | 43.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 55 | 12 | 43 | 21.8% | 78.2% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 52 | 3 | 49 | 5.8% | 94.2% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 47 | 8 | 39 | 17.0% | 83.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 41 | 13 | 28 | 31.7% | 68.3% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 30 | 25 | 5 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 28 | 4 | 24 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 28 | 16 | 12 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 22 | 11 | 11 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 19 | 8 | 11 | 42.1% | 57.9% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 12 | 9 | 3 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details |
View details
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
81
Grants
9
Denials
72
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
76
Grants
52
Denials
24
Grant rate: 68.4%Denial rate: 31.6%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
73
Grants
41
Denials
32
Grant rate: 56.2%Denial rate: 43.8%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
12
Denials
43
Grant rate: 21.8%Denial rate: 78.2%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
52
Grants
3
Denials
49
Grant rate: 5.8%Denial rate: 94.2%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
8
Denials
39
Grant rate: 17.0%Denial rate: 83.0%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
41
Grants
13
Denials
28
Grant rate: 31.7%Denial rate: 68.3%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
25
Denials
5
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
4
Denials
24
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
16
Denials
12
Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
11
Denials
11
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Cameroon
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
8
Denials
11
Grant rate: 42.1%Denial rate: 57.9%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
9
Denials
3
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Georgia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Mexico
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Themistoklis Aliferis
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 51.8%
- Denial Rate
- 48.2%
Lucy Billings
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 55.3%
- Denial Rate
- 44.8%
Patricia L. Buchanan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.3%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Shayne R Burnham
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 42.5%
- Denial Rate
- 57.5%
Howard I. Cohen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.9%
- Denial Rate
- 77.2%
Charles R. Conroy
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 27.9%
- Denial Rate
- 72.1%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.