Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
298
Grants
92
Denials
206
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
42.5%
727 / 1712
Total decisions
1712
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
42.5%
Grants: 727
Denial rate
57.5%
Denials: 985
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed Shayne R. Burnham to beginhearing cases in March 2019. Judge Burnham earned a Bachelor of Science in 2005 from the Pennsylvania State University and a Juris Doctor in 2010 from Syracuse University College of Law. From 2016 to 2019, she served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Miami.From 2011 to 2016, she served as an assistant attorney general for the Florida Office of Criminal Appeals Division. Judge Burnham is a member of the Florida Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Shayne R Burnham.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 298 | 92 | 206 | 30.9% | 69.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 205 | 170 | 35 | 82.9% | 17.1% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 175 | 112 | 63 | 64.0% | 36.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 163 | 29 | 134 | 17.8% | 82.2% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 145 | 37 | 108 | 25.5% | 74.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 109 | 29 | 80 | 26.6% | 73.4% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 100 | 12 | 88 | 12.0% | 88.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 82 | 26 | 56 | 31.7% | 68.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 49 | 18 | 31 | 36.7% | 63.3% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 39 | 19 | 20 | 48.7% | 51.3% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 37 | 32 | 5 | 86.5% | 13.5% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 34 | 29 | 5 | 85.3% | 14.7% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 26 | 8 | 18 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 25 | 10 | 15 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 24 | 14 | 10 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 12 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
298
Grants
92
Denials
206
Total decisions
205
Grants
170
Denials
35
Total decisions
175
Grants
112
Denials
63
Total decisions
163
Grants
29
Denials
134
Total decisions
145
Grants
37
Denials
108
Total decisions
109
Grants
29
Denials
80
Total decisions
100
Grants
12
Denials
88
Total decisions
82
Grants
26
Denials
56
Total decisions
49
Grants
18
Denials
31
Total decisions
39
Grants
19
Denials
20
Total decisions
37
Grants
32
Denials
5
Total decisions
34
Grants
29
Denials
5
Total decisions
26
Grants
8
Denials
18
Total decisions
25
Grants
10
Denials
15
Total decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Total decisions
24
Grants
14
Denials
10
Total decisions
12
Grants
4
Denials
8
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
12
Grants
5
Denials
7
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.