Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
5
Denials
37
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
51.8%
73 / 141
Total decisions
141
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
51.8%
Grants: 73
Denial rate
48.2%
Denials: 68
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Themistoklis E. Aliferis was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in February 2023. Judge Aliferis earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from Louisiana Tech University and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from Louisiana State University – Paul M. Hebert Law Center. From 2018 to 2022, he served as an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Miami. From 2007 to 2018, he was a solo practitioner representing noncitizens in Miami before the immigration court and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS. From 2005 to 2006, he was an associate attorney at Alipaz Abogados and later at Bolet & Terrero in La Paz, Bolivia, handling international trade transactions. From 2002 to 2005, he counseled commercial clients in Montreal, Canada. From 2001 to 2002, he practiced civil litigation at the law firm of Chopin, Wager, Cole, Richard, Reboul and Kutcher LLP in New Orleans. In 2000, he served as a judicial law clerk in the 15th Judicial District Court of Louisiana. Judge Aliferis is a member of the Florida Bar and the Louisiana State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Themistoklis Aliferis.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 42 | 5 | 37 | 11.9% | 88.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 14 | 13 | 1 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
42
Grants
5
Denials
37
Total decisions
14
Grants
13
Denials
1
Total decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.