Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
69
Grants
5
Denials
64
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
19.9%
87 / 436
Total decisions
436
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.9%
Grants: 87
Denial rate
80.0%
Denials: 349
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Christopher D. Mc Nary was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Mc Nary earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2008 from the University of San Francisco and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from the University of San Francisco School of Law. From 2018 to 2023, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Los Angeles. From 2017 to 2018, he served as a senior asylum officer, and from 2013 to 2017, he served as an asylum officer, with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS, in San Francisco. From 2011 to 2013, he served as a staff attorney with East Bay Sanctuary Covenant in Berkeley, California. Judge Mc Nary is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Christopher D McNary.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 69 | 5 | 64 | 7.2% | 92.8% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 62 | 25 | 37 | 40.3% | 59.7% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 55 | 0 | 55 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 47 | 2 | 45 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 41 | 14 | 27 | 34.1% | 65.9% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 36 | 8 | 28 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 23 | 13 | 10 | 56.5% | 43.5% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
69
Grants
5
Denials
64
Total decisions
62
Grants
25
Denials
37
Total decisions
55
Grants
0
Denials
55
Total decisions
47
Grants
2
Denials
45
Total decisions
41
Grants
14
Denials
27
Total decisions
36
Grants
8
Denials
28
Total decisions
28
Grants
0
Denials
28
Total decisions
23
Grants
13
Denials
10
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.