Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
119
Grants
0
Denials
119
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
12.5%
91 / 728
Total decisions
728
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.5%
Grants: 91
Denial rate
87.5%
Denials: 637
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Roberto K. Amaya was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in March 2022. Judge Amaya earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1998 from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, in San Francisco. From 2006 to 2022, he was in private practice at the Law Offices of Roberto K. Amaya, in Lancaster and Panorama City, California. From 2003 to 2006, he was an Associate Attorney with the Law Offices of Alma Rosa Nieto, in Los Angeles. In 2002, he was an Associate Attorney with the Law Offices of Edgardo Quintanilla, in Sherman Oaks, California. Judge Amaya is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Roberto Amaya.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia Sufficient sample | 119 | 0 | 119 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 115 | 0 | 115 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 99 | 14 | 85 | 14.1% | 85.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 92 | 1 | 91 | 1.1% | 98.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 81 | 6 | 75 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 47 | 0 | 47 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 45 | 21 | 24 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 33 | 9 | 24 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Stateless — person unable to name a country Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guadeloupe Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
119
Grants
0
Denials
119
Total decisions
115
Grants
0
Denials
115
Total decisions
99
Grants
14
Denials
85
Total decisions
92
Grants
1
Denials
91
Total decisions
81
Grants
6
Denials
75
Total decisions
47
Grants
0
Denials
47
Total decisions
45
Grants
21
Denials
24
Total decisions
33
Grants
9
Denials
24
Total decisions
27
Grants
0
Denials
27
Total decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Total decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.