Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
157
Grants
4
Denials
153
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
24.1%
199 / 827
Total decisions
827
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
24.1%
Grants: 199
Denial rate
75.9%
Denials: 628
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Alicia D. Brooks was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in December 2021. Judge Brooks earned a Bachelor of Science in 1988 and a Juris Doctor in 1991 from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. From 2019 to 2021, she served as a Judicial Hearing Officer with the Clerk of Superior Court in Mecklenburg County in Charlotte, North Carolina. From 2014 to 2018, she served as an elected District Court Judge, in Charlotte. From 2003 to 2014, she was a solo practitioner with The Brooks Law Firm PC, in Charlotte. From 1999 to 2003, she was in private practice with Klein and Brooks, in Charlotte. From 1997 to 1999, she served as an Assistant District Attorney with the Mecklenburg County District Attorney’s Office. From 1992 to 1997, she served as an Assistant Public Defender for Mecklenburg County. Judge Brooks is a member of the North Carolina Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Alicia Brooks.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 157 | 4 | 153 | 2.5% | 97.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 112 | 14 | 98 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 108 | 40 | 68 | 37.0% | 63.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 85 | 51 | 34 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 76 | 28 | 48 | 36.8% | 63.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 49 | 0 | 49 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 43 | 1 | 42 | 2.3% | 97.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 42 | 16 | 26 | 38.1% | 61.9% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 23 | 1 | 22 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
157
Grants
4
Denials
153
Total decisions
112
Grants
14
Denials
98
Total decisions
108
Grants
40
Denials
68
Total decisions
85
Grants
51
Denials
34
Total decisions
76
Grants
28
Denials
48
Total decisions
49
Grants
0
Denials
49
Total decisions
43
Grants
1
Denials
42
Total decisions
42
Grants
16
Denials
26
Total decisions
29
Grants
0
Denials
29
Total decisions
23
Grants
1
Denials
22
Total decisions
18
Grants
6
Denials
12
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.