Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
841
Grants
231
Denials
610
Grant rate: 27.5%Denial rate: 72.5%
Immigration judge
Jennifer Chung
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
31.7%
560 / 1769
Total decisions
1769
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
31.7%
Grants: 560
Denial rate
68.3%
Denials: 1209
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed Jennifer Chung to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Chung earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2004 from St. John’s University and a Juris Doctor in 2007 from Hofstra University School of Law. From 2008 to 2019, she worked as a managing attorney at Christophe Law Group P.C., in New York. Judge Chung is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants560 / 1769
Denials1209 / 1769
Other relief0 / 1769
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jennifer Chung.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 841 | 231 | 610 | 27.5% | 72.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 183 | 79 | 104 | 43.2% | 56.8% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 122 | 41 | 81 | 33.6% | 66.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 115 | 37 | 78 | 32.2% | 67.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 86 | 15 | 71 | 17.4% | 82.6% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 72 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 63.9% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Sufficient sample | 43 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 79.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 34 | 4 | 30 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 30 | 8 | 22 | 26.7% | 73.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 25 | 12 | 13 | 48.0% | 52.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 22 | 7 | 15 | 31.8% | 68.2% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 19 | 15 | 4 | 78.9% | 21.1% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 15 | 12 | 3 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Yemen Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
183
Grants
79
Denials
104
Grant rate: 43.2%Denial rate: 56.8%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
122
Grants
41
Denials
81
Grant rate: 33.6%Denial rate: 66.4%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
115
Grants
37
Denials
78
Grant rate: 32.2%Denial rate: 67.8%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
86
Grants
15
Denials
71
Grant rate: 17.4%Denial rate: 82.6%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
72
Grants
26
Denials
46
Grant rate: 36.1%Denial rate: 63.9%
Dominican Republic
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
9
Denials
34
Grant rate: 20.9%Denial rate: 79.1%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
4
Denials
30
Grant rate: 11.8%Denial rate: 88.2%
Bulgaria
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
8
Denials
22
Grant rate: 26.7%Denial rate: 73.3%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
12
Denials
13
Grant rate: 48.0%Denial rate: 52.0%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
7
Denials
15
Grant rate: 31.8%Denial rate: 68.2%
Uzbekistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
15
Denials
4
Grant rate: 78.9%Denial rate: 21.1%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
7
Denials
8
Grant rate: 46.7%Denial rate: 53.3%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
12
Denials
3
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Jamaica
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
3
Denials
10
Grant rate: 23.1%Denial rate: 76.9%
Brazil
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Grant rate: 8.3%Denial rate: 91.7%
Côte d’Ivoire
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
9
Denials
2
Grant rate: 81.8%Denial rate: 18.2%
Yemen
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%
Guinea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Thomas Bartleson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 59.7%
- Denial Rate
- 40.3%
John Burns
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 1.9%
- Denial Rate
- 98.1%
Andrew Calvelli
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 47.9%
- Denial Rate
- 52.1%
Anna Diao
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.8%
- Denial Rate
- 76.2%
Diane Dodd
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 29.5%
- Denial Rate
- 70.5%
Edward Grogan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 46.3%
- Denial Rate
- 53.7%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.