Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
141
Grants
23
Denials
118
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
23.8%
107 / 449
Total decisions
449
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
23.8%
Grants: 107
Denial rate
76.2%
Denials: 342
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Anna K. Diao was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Diao earned a Bachelor of Science in 2002 from the State University of New York at Binghamton and a Juris Doctor in 2007 from Fordham University School of Law. From 2007 to 2023, she served as an assistant district attorney for the Queens District Attorney’s Office in New York, which included the following positions: chief of the elder fraud unit (2022-2023); supervisor of the intake bureau (2019-2022); and senior assistant district attorney in the economic and environmental crimes bureau (2014-2019). Judge Diao is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Anna Diao.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 141 | 23 | 118 | 16.3% | 83.7% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 31 | 10 | 21 | 32.3% | 67.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 23 | 1 | 22 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 22 | 13 | 9 | 59.1% | 40.9% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 19 | 6 | 13 | 31.6% | 68.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.5% | 38.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 12 | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details |
Total decisions
141
Grants
23
Denials
118
Total decisions
31
Grants
10
Denials
21
Total decisions
26
Grants
0
Denials
26
Total decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Total decisions
23
Grants
1
Denials
22
Total decisions
22
Grants
13
Denials
9
Total decisions
19
Grants
6
Denials
13
Total decisions
14
Grants
1
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
8
Denials
5
Total decisions
12
Grants
8
Denials
4
Total decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Total decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.