Guinea
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
68
Grants
20
Denials
48
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
20.6%
82 / 399
Total decisions
399
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
20.6%
Grants: 82
Denial rate
79.5%
Denials: 317
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Sha Sha Xu was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Xu earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2007 from Duke University and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from the Temple University Beasley School of Law. From 2019 to 2023, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in New York. From 2016 to 2019, she served initially as an asylum officer and then as a senior asylum officer, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS, in New Jersey. From 2011 to 2016, she was in private practice at various law firms in New York and Pennsylvania. Judge Xu is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Shasha Xu.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guinea Sufficient sample | 68 | 20 | 48 | 29.4% | 70.6% | View details | |
Singapore Sufficient sample | 48 | 7 | 41 | 14.6% | 85.4% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 46 | 1 | 45 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 25 | 4 | 21 | 16.0% | 84.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 21 | 5 | 16 | 23.8% | 76.2% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% | 70.6% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Gabon Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details |
Total decisions
68
Grants
20
Denials
48
Total decisions
48
Grants
7
Denials
41
Total decisions
46
Grants
1
Denials
45
Total decisions
25
Grants
4
Denials
21
Total decisions
21
Grants
5
Denials
16
Total decisions
17
Grants
5
Denials
12
Total decisions
17
Grants
1
Denials
16
Total decisions
15
Grants
7
Denials
8
Total decisions
13
Grants
3
Denials
10
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
10
Grants
3
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.