Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
64
Grants
1
Denials
63
Grant rate: 1.6%Denial rate: 98.4%
Immigration judge
Kenley Thompson
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
12.4%
33 / 267
Total decisions
267
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.4%
Grants: 33
Denial rate
87.6%
Denials: 234
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Kenley J. Thompson as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Thompson earned a Bachelor of Business Administration in 1984 from Pittsburg State University and a Juris Doctor in 1989 from the Washburn University School of Law. From 2017 to 2020, he served as the county attorney, in Wilson County, Kansas. From 2011 to 2017, he served as the director of fraud investigations and deputy general counsel for the Kansas Department of Children and Families, in Topeka. From 2010 to 2011, he served as aregional attorney for the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, in Chanute.From 2003 to 2010, he was a project manager, Southeast Kansas, Young Williams Child Support Services, in Independence. From 1989 to 2019, he also served as a judge advocate for the U.S. Army and Army Reserve in the following locations: Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Leavenworth,Kansas; Fort Belvoir, Virginia; Taszar, Hungary; Eagle Base, Bosnia and Herzegovina;Baumholder, Germany; and Balad, Iraq. Judge Thompson is a member of the State Bar of Kansas and the Nebraska State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants33 / 267
Denials234 / 267
Other relief0 / 267
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Kenley Thompson.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 64 | 1 | 63 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 46 | 2 | 44 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 26 | 3 | 23 | 11.5% | 88.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 26 | 5 | 21 | 19.2% | 80.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Lebanon Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Iceland Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details |
View details
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
46
Grants
2
Denials
44
Grant rate: 4.3%Denial rate: 95.7%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
3
Denials
23
Grant rate: 11.5%Denial rate: 88.5%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
0
Denials
26
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
5
Denials
21
Grant rate: 19.2%Denial rate: 80.8%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
1
Denials
16
Grant rate: 5.9%Denial rate: 94.1%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
5
Denials
5
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Lebanon
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Syria
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Belarus
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Iceland
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Singapore
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Grant rate: -Denial rate: -
Angola
Small sampleTotal decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Grant rate: -Denial rate: -
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Jonathan Charles. Andresen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Kevin Brown
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 3.2%
- Denial Rate
- 96.8%
Miguel A Cordero Gonzalez
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.0%
- Denial Rate
- 93.0%
Geoffrey Hoffman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 16.2%
- Denial Rate
- 83.8%
Arkesia Jenkins
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.5%
- Denial Rate
- 95.5%
Delana M Jones
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 3.8%
- Denial Rate
- 96.2%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.