Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
187
Grants
2
Denials
185
Grant rate: 1.1%Denial rate: 98.9%
Immigration judge
Kevin Brown
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
3.2%
31 / 965
Total decisions
965
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
3.2%
Grants: 31
Denial rate
96.8%
Denials: 934
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed Kevin L. Brown to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Brown earned a Bachelor of Science in 1993 from Virginia Tech, a Master of Science in 1996 from Grambling State University, a Juris Doctor in 1999 from Wake Forest University School of Law, and a Master of Laws in 2007 from the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, U.S. Army. From 2016 to 2019, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in San Antonio, Texas. From 1999 to 2016, he served as a judge advocate for the U.S. Army in the following locations: Fort Gordon, Georgia; Fort Bragg, North Carolina; Karshi-Khanabad, Uzbekistan; Charlottesville, Virginia; Fort Campbell, Kentucky; Tikrit, Iraq; Fort Irwin, California; Suffolk, Virginia; and Fort Sam, Houston, Texas. Judge Brown is a member of the State Bar of Georgia.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants31 / 965
Denials934 / 965
Other relief0 / 965
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Kevin Brown.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 187 | 2 | 185 | 1.1% | 98.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 160 | 0 | 160 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 144 | 3 | 141 | 2.1% | 97.9% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 121 | 3 | 118 | 2.5% | 97.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 68 | 0 | 68 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 64 | 0 | 64 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 57 | 0 | 57 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 54 | 0 | 54 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 15 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% | 73.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
India Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Stateless — person unable to name a country Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Equatorial Guinea Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
160
Grants
0
Denials
160
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
144
Grants
3
Denials
141
Grant rate: 2.1%Denial rate: 97.9%
Cuba
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
121
Grants
3
Denials
118
Grant rate: 2.5%Denial rate: 97.5%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
68
Grants
0
Denials
68
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
64
Grants
0
Denials
64
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
57
Grants
0
Denials
57
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
54
Grants
0
Denials
54
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
4
Denials
11
Grant rate: 26.7%Denial rate: 73.3%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
9
Denials
2
Grant rate: 81.8%Denial rate: 18.2%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Romania
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Stateless — person unable to name a country
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Iraq
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Singapore
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Equatorial Guinea
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Jonathan Charles. Andresen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Miguel A Cordero Gonzalez
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.0%
- Denial Rate
- 93.0%
Geoffrey Hoffman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 16.2%
- Denial Rate
- 83.8%
Arkesia Jenkins
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.5%
- Denial Rate
- 95.5%
Delana M Jones
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 3.8%
- Denial Rate
- 96.2%
Jacquelyn J Joyce
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 3.1%
- Denial Rate
- 96.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.