Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
140
Grants
3
Denials
137
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
4.5%
29 / 643
Total decisions
643
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
4.5%
Grants: 29
Denial rate
95.5%
Denials: 614
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Arkesia S. Jenkins as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Jenkins earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2007 from Albany State University anda Juris Doctor in 2010 from the University of Georgia School of Law. From 2017 to 2020, sheserved as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Atlanta.From 2013 to 2016, she served as an assistant district attorney with the Flint Judicial Circuit, in Mc Donough, Georgia. From 2010 to 2013, she served as an assistant district attorney with the Dougherty Judicial Circuit, in Albany, Georgia. Judge Jenkins is a member of the Georgia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Arkesia Jenkins.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 140 | 3 | 137 | 2.1% | 97.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 133 | 4 | 129 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 80 | 0 | 80 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 56 | 1 | 55 | 1.8% | 98.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 53 | 0 | 53 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 45 | 2 | 43 | 4.4% | 95.6% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 39 | 0 | 39 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 15 | 5 | 10 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
140
Grants
3
Denials
137
Total decisions
133
Grants
4
Denials
129
Total decisions
80
Grants
0
Denials
80
Total decisions
56
Grants
1
Denials
55
Total decisions
53
Grants
0
Denials
53
Total decisions
45
Grants
2
Denials
43
Total decisions
39
Grants
0
Denials
39
Total decisions
28
Grants
0
Denials
28
Total decisions
15
Grants
5
Denials
10
Total decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.