Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
68
Grants
5
Denials
63
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
19.8%
71 / 358
Total decisions
358
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.8%
Grants: 71
Denial rate
80.2%
Denials: 287
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Lindsay Weatherbee Pepi was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Pepi earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2004 from Northeastern University, and a joint Master of Science/Juris Doctor in 2007 from Roger Williams University/Roger Williams University School of Law. From 2021 to 2023, she served as a deputy city attorney with the Office of the City Attorney, in San Diego. From 2007 to 2021, she served as a U.S. Navy judge advocate in the following locations: Groton, Connecticut; Washington D.C.; Bagram, Afghanistan; Bremerton, Washington; Jacksonville, Florida; and San Diego. Judge Pepi is a member of the State Bar of California, the Massachusetts Bar, and the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Lindsay W Pepi.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia Sufficient sample | 68 | 5 | 63 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 64 | 27 | 37 | 42.2% | 57.8% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 48 | 2 | 46 | 4.2% | 95.8% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 24 | 5 | 19 | 20.8% | 79.2% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 12 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Türkiye Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
68
Grants
5
Denials
63
Total decisions
64
Grants
27
Denials
37
Total decisions
48
Grants
2
Denials
46
Total decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Total decisions
27
Grants
0
Denials
27
Total decisions
24
Grants
5
Denials
19
Total decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Total decisions
12
Grants
5
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.