Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
64
Grants
2
Denials
62
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
8.5%
32 / 377
Total decisions
377
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
8.5%
Grants: 32
Denial rate
91.5%
Denials: 345
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
David M. Paxton was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in April 2021.Judge Paxton earned a Bachelor of Science in 1998 from Texas State University, a Master of Business Administration in 2004 from the University of Texas at Austin, and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from Santa Clara University School of Law. From 2015 to 2021, he served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, in Mc Allen and Corpus Christi. From 2011 to 2015, he served as a Deputy District Attorney for the San Luis Obispo County District Attorney’s Office, in San Luis Obispo, California. From 2010 to 2011, he served as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Criminal Division of the Northern District of California, in San Jose. From 1997 to 2004, he served as a Systems Engineer for Advanced Micro Devices and Legerity Inc., in Austin, Texas. Judge Paxton is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David M Paxton.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 64 | 2 | 62 | 3.1% | 96.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 52 | 4 | 48 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 46 | 1 | 45 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 40 | 3 | 37 | 7.5% | 92.5% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 25 | 1 | 24 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Equatorial Guinea Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
64
Grants
2
Denials
62
Total decisions
52
Grants
4
Denials
48
Total decisions
46
Grants
1
Denials
45
Total decisions
40
Grants
0
Denials
40
Total decisions
40
Grants
3
Denials
37
Total decisions
25
Grants
1
Denials
24
Total decisions
19
Grants
5
Denials
14
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.