India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
161
Grants
35
Denials
126
Grant rate: 21.7%Denial rate: 78.3%
Immigration judge
Marlem Nava
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
33.8%
204 / 604
Total decisions
604
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
33.8%
Grants: 204
Denial rate
66.2%
Denials: 400
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Marlem Nava was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Nava earned a Bachelor of Science in 1997 from De Paul University and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from University of Illinois Chicago School of Law (formerly known as the John Marshall Law School). From 2016 to 2022, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in San Francisco. From 2015 to 2016, she was an associate attorney with the Salgado and Associates law firm in San Francisco. From 2013 to 2015, she was in private practice. From 2003 to 2013, she served as an assistant state’s attorney with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office in Chicago. Judge Nava is a member of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants204 / 604
Denials400 / 604
Other relief0 / 604
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Marlem Nava.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 161 | 35 | 126 | 21.7% | 78.3% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 78 | 32 | 46 | 41.0% | 59.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 71 | 7 | 64 | 9.9% | 90.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 60 | 38 | 22 | 63.3% | 36.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 56 | 20 | 36 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 42 | 12 | 30 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 35 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 28 | 10 | 18 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 23 | 12 | 11 | 52.2% | 47.8% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Stateless — person unable to name a country Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
China Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Panama Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
78
Grants
32
Denials
46
Grant rate: 41.0%Denial rate: 59.0%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
71
Grants
7
Denials
64
Grant rate: 9.9%Denial rate: 90.1%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
60
Grants
38
Denials
22
Grant rate: 63.3%Denial rate: 36.7%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
56
Grants
20
Denials
36
Grant rate: 35.7%Denial rate: 64.3%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
12
Denials
30
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
10
Denials
25
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
10
Denials
18
Grant rate: 35.7%Denial rate: 64.3%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
12
Denials
11
Grant rate: 52.2%Denial rate: 47.8%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
8
Denials
2
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Stateless — person unable to name a country
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Kazakhstan
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
China
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Panama
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Lauren M. Black
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Lisa M. Calero
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Florence A Chamberlin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 69.6%
- Denial Rate
- 30.4%
Colin P Eichenberger
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.7%
- Denial Rate
- 64.3%
John F. Jakubowski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Stephen F. Keane
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.