Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
165
Grants
24
Denials
141
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
30.4%
233 / 766
Total decisions
766
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
30.4%
Grants: 233
Denial rate
69.6%
Denials: 533
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Judge Martinez in August 2010. Judge Martinez received a bachelor or arts degree in 1994 from Amherst College and a juris doctorate in 2000 from Columbia University School of Law. From 2005 to August 2010, Judge Martinez served as deputy chief counsel in the Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security, San Antonio, Texas. From 2001 to 2005, he worked as assistant chief counsel for ICE in New York, N.Y., and San Antonio. From 2000 to 2001, he was assistant chief counsel for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service in Newark, N.J. Judge Martinez is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Anibal D Martinez.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 165 | 24 | 141 | 14.5% | 85.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 99 | 14 | 85 | 14.1% | 85.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 85 | 6 | 79 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 61 | 8 | 53 | 13.1% | 86.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 60 | 30 | 30 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 48 | 15 | 33 | 31.3% | 68.8% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 32 | 27 | 5 | 84.4% | 15.6% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 28 | 22 | 6 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 25 | 24 | 1 | 96.0% | 4.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 22 | 9 | 13 | 40.9% | 59.1% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 19 | 12 | 7 | 63.2% | 36.8% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Rwanda Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details |
Total decisions
165
Grants
24
Denials
141
Total decisions
99
Grants
14
Denials
85
Total decisions
85
Grants
6
Denials
79
Total decisions
61
Grants
8
Denials
53
Total decisions
60
Grants
30
Denials
30
Total decisions
48
Grants
15
Denials
33
Total decisions
32
Grants
27
Denials
5
Total decisions
28
Grants
22
Denials
6
Total decisions
25
Grants
24
Denials
1
Total decisions
22
Grants
9
Denials
13
Total decisions
20
Grants
0
Denials
20
Total decisions
19
Grants
12
Denials
7
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.