Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
98
Grants
3
Denials
95
Grant rate: 3.1%Denial rate: 96.9%
Immigration judge
Richard F. Brodsky
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
24.8%
115 / 463
Total decisions
463
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
24.8%
Grants: 115
Denial rate
75.2%
Denials: 348
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants115 / 463
Denials348 / 463
Other relief0 / 463
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Richard F. Brodsky.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 98 | 3 | 95 | 3.1% | 96.9% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 83 | 24 | 59 | 28.9% | 71.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 78 | 8 | 70 | 10.3% | 89.7% | View details | |
Iran Sufficient sample | 32 | 18 | 14 | 56.3% | 43.8% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 29 | 2 | 27 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Jordan Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Lebanon Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Hungary Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Poland Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Antigua & Barbuda Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
83
Grants
24
Denials
59
Grant rate: 28.9%Denial rate: 71.1%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
78
Grants
8
Denials
70
Grant rate: 10.3%Denial rate: 89.7%
Iran
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
18
Denials
14
Grant rate: 56.3%Denial rate: 43.8%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
2
Denials
27
Grant rate: 6.9%Denial rate: 93.1%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
2
Denials
12
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Mexico
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Jordan
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Lebanon
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Albania
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Hungary
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Peru
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Poland
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Antigua & Barbuda
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Justin Adams
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 12.7%
- Denial Rate
- 87.3%
Arvid C. Boyes
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.7%
- Denial Rate
- 76.3%
Margaret D Burkhart
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 65.2%
- Denial Rate
- 34.8%
Thomas G. Jr Crossan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.1%
- Denial Rate
- 79.9%
Yvonne S. Gonzalez
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 38.6%
- Denial Rate
- 61.4%
Craig A Harlow
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 28.6%
- Denial Rate
- 71.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.