Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
190
Grants
14
Denials
176
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
29.3%
187 / 639
Total decisions
639
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
29.3%
Grants: 187
Denial rate
70.7%
Denials: 452
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Kalenna Lee was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2023. Judge Lee earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2005 from New York University and a Juris Doctor in 2010 from Brooklyn Law School. From 2015 to 2023, she served as an assistant chief counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in New York. From 2013 to 2015, she served as an asylum officer, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), DHS. From 2010 to 2013, she was in private practice at the law firm of Kuzmin and Associates PC in New York representing noncitizens before EOIR and USCIS. Judge Lee is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Kalenna Lee.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 190 | 14 | 176 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 55 | 36 | 19 | 65.5% | 34.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 51 | 5 | 46 | 9.8% | 90.2% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 39 | 4 | 35 | 10.3% | 89.7% | View details | |
Singapore Sufficient sample | 33 | 5 | 28 | 15.2% | 84.8% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 28 | 3 | 25 | 10.7% | 89.3% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 21 | 7 | 14 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 21 | 5 | 16 | 23.8% | 76.2% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 19 | 15 | 4 | 78.9% | 21.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 14 | 11 | 3 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 12 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
190
Grants
14
Denials
176
Total decisions
55
Grants
36
Denials
19
Total decisions
51
Grants
5
Denials
46
Total decisions
39
Grants
4
Denials
35
Total decisions
33
Grants
5
Denials
28
Total decisions
28
Grants
3
Denials
25
Total decisions
21
Grants
7
Denials
14
Total decisions
21
Grants
5
Denials
16
Total decisions
19
Grants
15
Denials
4
Total decisions
14
Grants
11
Denials
3
Total decisions
12
Grants
2
Denials
10
Total decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Total decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Total decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.