Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
843
Grants
117
Denials
726
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
22.6%
415 / 1834
Total decisions
1834
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
22.6%
Grants: 415
Denial rate
77.4%
Denials: 1419
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Shirley Lazare-Raphael as an Immigration Judge in December 2020. Judge Lazare-Raphael earned a Bachelor of Business Administration in 1996from the City University of New York, Bernard M. Baruch College, and a Juris Doctor in 2000from Brooklyn Law School. From 2019 to 2020, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Officeof the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in New York. From 2005 to 2019, she was in private practice as an assistantlitigation attorney with Frenkel, Hershkowitz & Shafran LLP. From 2001 to 2004, she was inprivate practice in Brooklyn and New York. Judge Lazare-Raphael is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Shirley Lazare-Raphael.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 843 | 117 | 726 | 13.9% | 86.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 204 | 43 | 161 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 129 | 17 | 112 | 13.2% | 86.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 87 | 26 | 61 | 29.9% | 70.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 59 | 7 | 52 | 11.9% | 88.1% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 53 | 11 | 42 | 20.8% | 79.2% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Sufficient sample | 48 | 34 | 14 | 70.8% | 29.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 42 | 8 | 34 | 19.0% | 81.0% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 38 | 11 | 27 | 28.9% | 71.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 33 | 27 | 6 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Sufficient sample | 30 | 1 | 29 | 3.3% | 96.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 28 | 22 | 6 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 27 | 14 | 13 | 51.9% | 48.1% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 22 | 6 | 16 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 21 | 13 | 8 | 61.9% | 38.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 21 | 5 | 16 | 23.8% | 76.2% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 18 | 7 | 11 | 38.9% | 61.1% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details |
Total decisions
843
Grants
117
Denials
726
Total decisions
204
Grants
43
Denials
161
Total decisions
129
Grants
17
Denials
112
Total decisions
87
Grants
26
Denials
61
Total decisions
59
Grants
7
Denials
52
Total decisions
53
Grants
11
Denials
42
Total decisions
48
Grants
34
Denials
14
Total decisions
42
Grants
8
Denials
34
Total decisions
38
Grants
11
Denials
27
Total decisions
33
Grants
27
Denials
6
Total decisions
30
Grants
1
Denials
29
Total decisions
28
Grants
22
Denials
6
Total decisions
27
Grants
14
Denials
13
Total decisions
22
Grants
6
Denials
16
Total decisions
21
Grants
13
Denials
8
Total decisions
21
Grants
5
Denials
16
Total decisions
18
Grants
7
Denials
11
Total decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Total decisions
16
Grants
6
Denials
10
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.