Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
84
Grants
13
Denials
71
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
36.4%
295 / 810
Total decisions
810
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
36.4%
Grants: 295
Denial rate
63.6%
Denials: 515
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Carolyn L. Krasinski as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Krasinski earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1988 from University at Albany and a Juris Doctor in 1992 from University of Florida College of Law. From 1995 to 2020, she servedas an attorney advisor, Department of Veterans Affairs, Board of Veterans’ Appeals, in the District of Columbia. During that time, from 2001 to 2020, she also served as an acting veteranslaw judge, Board of Veterans’ Appeals, in the District of Columbia. Judge Krasinski is a memberof the Florida State Bar and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Carolyn Krasinski.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 84 | 13 | 71 | 15.5% | 84.5% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 83 | 23 | 60 | 27.7% | 72.3% | View details | |
Singapore Sufficient sample | 66 | 6 | 60 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 61 | 51 | 10 | 83.6% | 16.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 50 | 22 | 28 | 44.0% | 56.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 40 | 10 | 30 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 40 | 16 | 24 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 39 | 10 | 29 | 25.6% | 74.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 38 | 11 | 27 | 28.9% | 71.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 32 | 1 | 31 | 3.1% | 96.9% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 26 | 16 | 10 | 61.5% | 38.5% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 24 | 8 | 16 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35.0% | 65.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 20 | 20 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 15 | 5 | 10 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 15 | 10 | 5 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details |
Total decisions
84
Grants
13
Denials
71
Total decisions
83
Grants
23
Denials
60
Total decisions
66
Grants
6
Denials
60
Total decisions
61
Grants
51
Denials
10
Total decisions
50
Grants
22
Denials
28
Total decisions
40
Grants
10
Denials
30
Total decisions
40
Grants
16
Denials
24
Total decisions
39
Grants
10
Denials
29
Total decisions
38
Grants
11
Denials
27
Total decisions
32
Grants
1
Denials
31
Total decisions
26
Grants
16
Denials
10
Total decisions
24
Grants
8
Denials
16
Total decisions
20
Grants
7
Denials
13
Total decisions
20
Grants
0
Denials
20
Total decisions
20
Grants
20
Denials
0
Total decisions
15
Grants
5
Denials
10
Total decisions
15
Grants
10
Denials
5
Total decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
4
Denials
8
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.