Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
107
Grants
1
Denials
106
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
5.3%
32 / 601
Total decisions
601
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
5.3%
Grants: 32
Denial rate
94.7%
Denials: 569
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Kelly Scot Johnson to begin hearing cases in November 2018. Judge Johnson earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from the University of Missouri and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from the University of Tennessee College of Law. From 2012 to 2018, he served as an assistant chief counsel and deputy chief counsel with the Office ofthe Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Lumpkin, Georgia. From 2010 to 2012, he served as an assistant chiefcounsel with ICE, DHS, in Port Isabel, Texas. From 2001 to 2010, he was an attorney in privatepractice, in Knoxville, Tennessee. Judge Johnson is a member of the Tennessee Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Kelly S Johnson.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 107 | 1 | 106 | 0.9% | 99.1% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 102 | 0 | 102 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 90 | 3 | 87 | 3.3% | 96.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 52 | 1 | 51 | 1.9% | 98.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 48 | 0 | 48 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 40 | 1 | 39 | 2.5% | 97.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 18 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
107
Grants
1
Denials
106
Total decisions
102
Grants
0
Denials
102
Total decisions
90
Grants
3
Denials
87
Total decisions
52
Grants
1
Denials
51
Total decisions
48
Grants
0
Denials
48
Total decisions
40
Grants
1
Denials
39
Total decisions
18
Grants
3
Denials
15
Total decisions
17
Grants
0
Denials
17
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.