Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
112
Grants
10
Denials
102
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
23.5%
153 / 650
Total decisions
650
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
23.5%
Grants: 153
Denial rate
76.5%
Denials: 497
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Alisha C. Campos was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2021. Judge Campos earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1997 from Arkansas State University and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from University of Houston Law Center. From 2018 to 2021, she served as an Assistant Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Houston. From 2010 to 2018, she was Director of Operations at Lookout Services, in Stafford, Texas. From 2001 to 2010, she was an Immigration Attorney with Morley & Morley PC, in Bellaire, Texas. Judge Campos is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Alisha C Campos.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 112 | 10 | 102 | 8.9% | 91.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 101 | 10 | 91 | 9.9% | 90.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 99 | 44 | 55 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 68 | 4 | 64 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 50 | 28 | 22 | 56.0% | 44.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 29 | 2 | 27 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45.0% | 55.0% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Vietnam Moderate sample | 14 | 9 | 5 | 64.3% | 35.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
South Africa Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details |
Total decisions
112
Grants
10
Denials
102
Total decisions
101
Grants
10
Denials
91
Total decisions
99
Grants
44
Denials
55
Total decisions
68
Grants
4
Denials
64
Total decisions
50
Grants
0
Denials
50
Total decisions
50
Grants
28
Denials
22
Total decisions
29
Grants
2
Denials
27
Total decisions
20
Grants
9
Denials
11
Total decisions
19
Grants
5
Denials
14
Total decisions
14
Grants
9
Denials
5
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.