Guinea
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
70
Grants
23
Denials
47
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
20.0%
76 / 380
Total decisions
380
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
20.0%
Grants: 76
Denial rate
80.0%
Denials: 304
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Habib was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Habib earned a Bachelor of Business Administration in 2010 from the University of Georgia and a Juris Doctor in 2014 from Georgia State University College of Law. From 2020 to 2024, he served as deputy chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in New York City. From 2018 to 2020, he served as an assistant chief counsel with OPLA, ICE, DHS, where he also served as legal counsel to Homeland Security Investigations, New York. From 2014 to 2018, he served as an assistant chief counsel with OPLA, ICE, DHS, in Lumpkin, Georgia, and New York City. Judge Habib is a member of the State Bar of Georgia.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Fayaz Habib.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guinea Sufficient sample | 70 | 23 | 47 | 32.9% | 67.1% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 55 | 4 | 51 | 7.3% | 92.7% | View details | |
Singapore Sufficient sample | 48 | 3 | 45 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 17 | 9 | 8 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
70
Grants
23
Denials
47
Total decisions
55
Grants
4
Denials
51
Total decisions
48
Grants
3
Denials
45
Total decisions
20
Grants
8
Denials
12
Total decisions
17
Grants
9
Denials
8
Total decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
10
Grants
5
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.