Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
399
Grants
91
Denials
308
Grant rate: 22.8%Denial rate: 77.2%
Immigration judge
Robert Gundlach
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
34.9%
598 / 1713
Total decisions
1713
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.9%
Grants: 598
Denial rate
65.1%
Denials: 1115
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Robert J. Gundlach as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Gundlach earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2004 from the University of Michiganand a Juris Doctor in 2009 from Wayne State University Law School. From 2016 to 2020, heserved as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in New York. From 2011 to 2016, he served as an attorney advisor for the Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), Department of Justice (DOJ). From 2009 to 2011, he served as a judicial law clerk and attorney advisor for the New York City Immigration Court, EOIR, DOJ, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Gundlach is a member of the State Bar of Michigan and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants598 / 1713
Denials1115 / 1713
Other relief0 / 1713
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Robert Gundlach.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 399 | 91 | 308 | 22.8% | 77.2% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 313 | 32 | 281 | 10.2% | 89.8% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 108 | 60 | 48 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 97 | 26 | 71 | 26.8% | 73.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 84 | 16 | 68 | 19.0% | 81.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 77 | 16 | 61 | 20.8% | 79.2% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 65 | 65 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Singapore Sufficient sample | 58 | 7 | 51 | 12.1% | 87.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 50 | 25 | 25 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 46 | 23 | 23 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ghana Sufficient sample | 44 | 28 | 16 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 33 | 16 | 17 | 48.5% | 51.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 31 | 25 | 6 | 80.6% | 19.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 27 | 17 | 10 | 63.0% | 37.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 26 | 26 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 18 | 2 | 16 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 18 | 14 | 4 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 14 | 7 | 7 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
313
Grants
32
Denials
281
Grant rate: 10.2%Denial rate: 89.8%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
108
Grants
60
Denials
48
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
Guinea
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
97
Grants
26
Denials
71
Grant rate: 26.8%Denial rate: 73.2%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
84
Grants
16
Denials
68
Grant rate: 19.0%Denial rate: 81.0%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
77
Grants
16
Denials
61
Grant rate: 20.8%Denial rate: 79.2%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
65
Grants
65
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Singapore
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
58
Grants
7
Denials
51
Grant rate: 12.1%Denial rate: 87.9%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
25
Denials
25
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
46
Grants
23
Denials
23
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Ghana
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
28
Denials
16
Grant rate: 63.6%Denial rate: 36.4%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
16
Denials
17
Grant rate: 48.5%Denial rate: 51.5%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
25
Denials
6
Grant rate: 80.6%Denial rate: 19.4%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
17
Denials
10
Grant rate: 63.0%Denial rate: 37.0%
Uzbekistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
26
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Dominican Republic
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
2
Denials
16
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
14
Denials
4
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Iran
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
8
Denials
10
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
Bulgaria
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
12
Denials
4
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Mauritania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
7
Denials
7
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Thomas Bartleson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 59.7%
- Denial Rate
- 40.3%
John Burns
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 1.9%
- Denial Rate
- 98.1%
Andrew Calvelli
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 47.9%
- Denial Rate
- 52.1%
Jennifer Chung
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.7%
- Denial Rate
- 68.3%
Anna Diao
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.8%
- Denial Rate
- 76.2%
Diane Dodd
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 29.5%
- Denial Rate
- 70.5%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.