GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
286
Grants
6
Denials
280
Grant rate: 2.1%Denial rate: 97.9%
Immigration judge
Benton, Jimmie Lee
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
12.9%
185 / 1433
Total decisions
1433
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.9%
Grants: 185
Denial rate
87.1%
Denials: 1248
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants185 / 1433
Denials1248 / 1433
Other relief0 / 1433
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 286 | 6 | 280 | 2.1% | 97.9% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 202 | 2 | 200 | 1.0% | 99.0% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 143 | 8 | 135 | 5.6% | 94.4% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 70 | 1 | 69 | 1.4% | 98.6% | View details | |
VIETNAM Larger sample | 68 | 10 | 58 | 14.7% | 85.3% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 47 | 6 | 41 | 12.8% | 87.2% | View details | |
CHINA Larger sample | 43 | 17 | 26 | 39.5% | 60.5% | View details | |
CUBA Larger sample | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Larger sample | 35 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% | 62.9% | View details | |
SOMALIA Larger sample | 35 | 22 | 13 | 62.9% | 37.1% | View details | |
ARMENIA Larger sample | 32 | 4 | 28 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Larger sample | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 29 | 2 | 27 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
NIGERIA Medium sample | 25 | 2 | 23 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 23 | 7 | 16 | 30.4% | 69.6% | View details | |
MAURITANIA Medium sample | 21 | 16 | 5 | 76.2% | 23.8% | View details | |
PERU Medium sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
PHILIPPINES Medium sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Medium sample | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
CAMEROON Medium sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details |
View details
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
202
Grants
2
Denials
200
Grant rate: 1.0%Denial rate: 99.0%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
143
Grants
8
Denials
135
Grant rate: 5.6%Denial rate: 94.4%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
70
Grants
1
Denials
69
Grant rate: 1.4%Denial rate: 98.6%
VIETNAM
Larger sampleTotal decisions
68
Grants
10
Denials
58
Grant rate: 14.7%Denial rate: 85.3%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
6
Denials
41
Grant rate: 12.8%Denial rate: 87.2%
CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
17
Denials
26
Grant rate: 39.5%Denial rate: 60.5%
CUBA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
PAKISTAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
13
Denials
22
Grant rate: 37.1%Denial rate: 62.9%
SOMALIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
22
Denials
13
Grant rate: 62.9%Denial rate: 37.1%
ARMENIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
4
Denials
28
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
NICARAGUA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
0
Denials
30
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
2
Denials
27
Grant rate: 6.9%Denial rate: 93.1%
NIGERIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
2
Denials
23
Grant rate: 8.0%Denial rate: 92.0%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
7
Denials
16
Grant rate: 30.4%Denial rate: 69.6%
MAURITANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
16
Denials
5
Grant rate: 76.2%Denial rate: 23.8%
PERU
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
PHILIPPINES
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
BANGLADESH
Medium sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
2
Denials
12
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
CAMEROON
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Grant rate: 46.2%Denial rate: 53.8%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.