Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
76
Grants
15
Denials
61
Grant rate: 19.7%Denial rate: 80.3%
Immigration judge
Janette L Allen
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
42.6%
174 / 408
Total decisions
408
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
42.6%
Grants: 174
Denial rate
57.4%
Denials: 234
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Janette L. Allen to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Allen earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2004 from Trinity University and a Juris Doctorin 2008 from American University. From 2016 to 2018, she served as senior litigation counselfor Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Department of Justice. From 2008 to 2016,she was a trial attorney with the same office, where she entered on duty as a law clerk in 2007through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Allen is a member of the Maryland State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants174 / 408
Denials234 / 408
Other relief0 / 408
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Janette L Allen.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 76 | 15 | 61 | 19.7% | 80.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 61 | 13 | 48 | 21.3% | 78.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 53 | 21 | 32 | 39.6% | 60.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 50 | 16 | 34 | 32.0% | 68.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 44 | 38 | 6 | 86.4% | 13.6% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 23 | 4 | 19 | 17.4% | 82.6% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 78.6% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 11 | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
61
Grants
13
Denials
48
Grant rate: 21.3%Denial rate: 78.7%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
53
Grants
21
Denials
32
Grant rate: 39.6%Denial rate: 60.4%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
16
Denials
34
Grant rate: 32.0%Denial rate: 68.0%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
38
Denials
6
Grant rate: 86.4%Denial rate: 13.6%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
4
Denials
19
Grant rate: 17.4%Denial rate: 82.6%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
15
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
3
Denials
11
Grant rate: 21.4%Denial rate: 78.6%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
7
Denials
4
Grant rate: 63.6%Denial rate: 36.4%
Colombia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
Grant rate: 22.2%Denial rate: 77.8%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Egypt
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Armenia
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Niue
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Dale E. Anderson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 2.6%
- Denial Rate
- 97.4%
Peter L. Ashman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Joyce Bakke Varzandeh
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 42.2%
- Denial Rate
- 57.8%
Ira Bank
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 28.0%
- Denial Rate
- 72.0%
Lori R. Bass
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 40.4%
- Denial Rate
- 59.6%
Audra R Behne
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 21.5%
- Denial Rate
- 78.5%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.