CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
177
Grants
111
Denials
66
Grant rate: 62.7%Denial rate: 37.3%
Immigration judge
Miller, Nancy E.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
24.4%
211 / 864
Total decisions
864
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
24.4%
Grants: 211
Denial rate
75.6%
Denials: 653
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants211 / 864
Denials653 / 864
Other relief0 / 864
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 177 | 111 | 66 | 62.7% | 37.3% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 142 | 10 | 132 | 7.0% | 93.0% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 122 | 12 | 110 | 9.8% | 90.2% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 119 | 3 | 116 | 2.5% | 97.5% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 56 | 2 | 54 | 3.6% | 96.4% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Larger sample | 47 | 7 | 40 | 14.9% | 85.1% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 29 | 11 | 18 | 37.9% | 62.1% | View details | |
ARMENIA Medium sample | 27 | 9 | 18 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
INDIA Medium sample | 22 | 14 | 8 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
PERU Medium sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
ROMANIA Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
SYRIA Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
VENEZUELA Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
EGYPT Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
CUBA Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
ECUADOR Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
KAZAKHSTAN Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
142
Grants
10
Denials
132
Grant rate: 7.0%Denial rate: 93.0%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
122
Grants
12
Denials
110
Grant rate: 9.8%Denial rate: 90.2%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
119
Grants
3
Denials
116
Grant rate: 2.5%Denial rate: 97.5%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
56
Grants
2
Denials
54
Grant rate: 3.6%Denial rate: 96.4%
NICARAGUA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
7
Denials
40
Grant rate: 14.9%Denial rate: 85.1%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
11
Denials
18
Grant rate: 37.9%Denial rate: 62.1%
ARMENIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
9
Denials
18
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
INDIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
14
Denials
8
Grant rate: 63.6%Denial rate: 36.4%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
1
Denials
15
Grant rate: 6.3%Denial rate: 93.8%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
PERU
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
ROMANIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
SYRIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Grant rate: 87.5%Denial rate: 12.5%
VENEZUELA
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
BANGLADESH
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
EGYPT
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
CUBA
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
ECUADOR
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
KAZAKHSTAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.