Bratton, Scott
This court
Total Decisions
1251
Asylum Grant Rate
19.7%
Denials
80.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Immigration Court
6 judges · IN
Average Asylum Grant Rate
11.7%
416 / 3566
Average Asylum Grant Rate
11.7%
Asylum grants
416
Denials
3150
Judges indexed
6
Indianapolis, Indiana Immigration Court has 6 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
This court
Total Decisions
1251
Asylum Grant Rate
19.7%
Denials
80.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
This court
Total Decisions
987
Asylum Grant Rate
26.2%
Denials
73.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
This court
Total Decisions
791
Asylum Grant Rate
12.8%
Denials
87.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
This court
Total Decisions
650
Asylum Grant Rate
14.3%
Denials
85.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
This court
Total Decisions
643
Asylum Grant Rate
0.5%
Denials
99.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
This court
Total Decisions
Pending
Asylum Grant Rate
Pending
Denials
Pending
Other Relief Rate
Pending
No statistics yet
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICARAGUA | 11.6% | 72 | 547 | 619 |
| VENEZUELA | 29.6% | 170 | 405 | 575 |
| GUATEMALA | 2.9% | 12 | 395 | 407 |
| HONDURAS | 4.3% | 16 | 353 | 369 |
| MEXICO | 3.7% | 10 | 258 | 268 |
| NIGERIA | 21.7% | 55 | 198 | 253 |
| INDIA | 3.1% | 7 | 222 | 229 |
| EL SALVADOR | 2.2% | 4 | 174 | 178 |
| HAITI | 4.6% | 7 | 145 | 152 |
| COLOMBIA | 5.6% | 7 | 117 | 124 |
| MAURITANIA | 19.6% | 9 | 37 | 46 |
| RUSSIA | 15.2% | 5 | 28 | 33 |
| CUBA | 17.9% | 5 | 23 | 28 |
| ECUADOR | 0.0% | 0 | 27 | 27 |
| PERU | 0.0% | 0 | 26 | 26 |
| GUINEA | 13.6% | 3 | 19 | 22 |
| SENEGAL | 0.0% | 0 | 22 | 22 |
| VIETNAM | 4.5% | 1 | 21 | 22 |
| CHINA | 35.0% | 7 | 13 | 20 |
| CHILE | 0.0% | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| BRAZIL | 8.3% | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| PANAMA | 9.1% | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| NIGER | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| SUDAN | 25.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| CAMEROON | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| EGYPT | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| PAKISTAN | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| BOLIVIA | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| COSTA RICA | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| GHANA | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| KENYA | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| MALAWI | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| YEMEN | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| CONGO | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| ERITREA | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| ANGOLA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| BENIN | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| CHAD | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| JAMAICA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| RWANDA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| SOMALIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| TAJIKISTAN (TADZHIK) | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ZIMBABWE | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| AFGHANISTAN | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| BURKINA FASO | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| BURUNDI | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DOMINICAN REPUBLIC | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GUADELOUPE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| IRAQ | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE) | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MALI | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| NIUE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| SPAIN | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| SRI LANKA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| TOGO | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| TURKIYE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UGANDA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| UKRAINE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UNITED ARAB EMIRATES | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.