Michael W Straus
This court
Total Decisions
4857
Asylum Grant Rate
24.8%
Denials
75.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
← Back to all courtsactive active active active active active active active active
Immigration Court
Har Immigration Court
د ټولنې بحث · 010 judges · CT
- City / state
- Immigration Court, CT
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Average Asylum Grant Rate
29.4%
2588 / 8813
Average Asylum Grant Rate
29.4%
Asylum grants
2588
Denials
6225
Judges indexed
10
Har Immigration Court has 10 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
د ټولنې لید
د ټولنې بحث
د Har Immigration Court په اړه عامه تجربې او د بهیر خبرې ولولئ.
0 موضوعګانې
له دې عامه موضوعاتو پیل کولی شئ
- د عامه بهیر یا چمتووالي تجربه شریکه کړئ
- د عامه معلوماتو د لوستلو په اړه خبرې وکړئ
- پرته له شخصي قضیې جزئیاتو پوښتنه وکړئ
Judges indexed for this court
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
active
Daniel A Morris
This court
Total Decisions
1755
Asylum Grant Rate
27.6%
Denials
72.4%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Philip Verrillo
This court
Total Decisions
1251
Asylum Grant Rate
43.8%
Denials
56.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
John D. Carte'
This court
Total Decisions
554
Asylum Grant Rate
36.5%
Denials
63.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Theodore Doolittle
This court
Total Decisions
233
Asylum Grant Rate
50.2%
Denials
49.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Jonathan Goulding
This court
Total Decisions
175
Asylum Grant Rate
52.0%
Denials
48.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Harriet B. Marple
This court
Total Decisions
103
Asylum Grant Rate
33.0%
Denials
67.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Andrew J. Glass
This court
Total Decisions
96
Asylum Grant Rate
35.4%
Denials
64.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Kevin D. Smith
This court
Total Decisions
5
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Very small sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Visiting Judge 17
This court
Total Decisions
Pending
Asylum Grant Rate
Pending
Denials
Pending
Other Relief Rate
Pending
No statistics yet
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guatemala | 24.3% | 318 | 993 | 1311 |
| Ecuador | 13.9% | 157 | 973 | 1130 |
| Honduras | 27.4% | 196 | 520 | 716 |
| Brazil | 5.5% | 31 | 533 | 564 |
| El Salvador | 18.3% | 86 | 385 | 471 |
| Haiti | 20.5% | 72 | 279 | 351 |
| Colombia | 33.9% | 115 | 224 | 339 |
| ALBANIA | 38.2% | 123 | 199 | 322 |
| China | 41.9% | 135 | 187 | 322 |
| Peru | 23.1% | 66 | 220 | 286 |
| Former Countries | 18.1% | 32 | 145 | 177 |
| Pakistan | 44.1% | 67 | 85 | 152 |
| Nicaragua | 50.7% | 72 | 70 | 142 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 53.9% | 69 | 59 | 128 |
| TURKIYE | 75.0% | 96 | 32 | 128 |
| Venezuela | 68.1% | 79 | 37 | 116 |
| CONGO | 50.0% | 52 | 52 | 104 |
| Mexico | 19.0% | 19 | 81 | 100 |
| India | 18.9% | 18 | 77 | 95 |
| POLAND | 6.7% | 6 | 84 | 90 |
| JAMAICA | 18.3% | 15 | 67 | 82 |
| MACEDONIA | 27.0% | 20 | 54 | 74 |
| Nepal | 62.2% | 46 | 28 | 74 |
| Russia | 60.6% | 43 | 28 | 71 |
| Bangladesh | 54.3% | 38 | 32 | 70 |
| Egypt | 62.5% | 40 | 24 | 64 |
| Nigeria | 50.8% | 32 | 31 | 63 |
| Ghana | 40.0% | 22 | 33 | 55 |
| Ukraine | 49.1% | 26 | 27 | 53 |
| TOGO | 54.3% | 25 | 21 | 46 |
| Iran | 36.6% | 15 | 26 | 41 |
| GUINEA | 57.5% | 23 | 17 | 40 |
| Syria | 80.0% | 32 | 8 | 40 |
| ROMANIA | 17.9% | 7 | 32 | 39 |
| SRI LANKA | 47.2% | 17 | 19 | 36 |
| Cuba | 37.1% | 13 | 22 | 35 |
| LIBERIA | 47.1% | 16 | 18 | 34 |
| LEBANON | 46.7% | 14 | 16 | 30 |
| BELARUS | 96.6% | 28 | 1 | 29 |
| STATELESS - ALIEN UNABLE TO NAME A COUNTRY | 65.5% | 19 | 10 | 29 |
| Afghanistan | 67.9% | 19 | 9 | 28 |
| Dominican Republic | 16.7% | 4 | 20 | 24 |
| LIBYA | 16.7% | 4 | 20 | 24 |
| Former Countries | 36.4% | 8 | 14 | 22 |
| HUNGARY | 9.1% | 2 | 20 | 22 |
| INDONESIA | 0.0% | 0 | 21 | 21 |
| Cameroon | 50.0% | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| Vietnam | 10.0% | 2 | 18 | 20 |
| ZAMBIA | 31.6% | 6 | 13 | 19 |
| BULGARIA | 16.7% | 3 | 15 | 18 |
| IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE) | 38.9% | 7 | 11 | 18 |
| SUDAN | 61.1% | 11 | 7 | 18 |
| AZERBAIJAN | 70.6% | 12 | 5 | 17 |
| Ethiopia | 56.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| MOLDAVIA (MOLDOVA) | 56.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| BURKINA FASO | 66.7% | 10 | 5 | 15 |
| Iraq | 28.6% | 4 | 10 | 14 |
| PHILIPPINES | 0.0% | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Former Countries | 84.6% | 11 | 2 | 13 |
| KENYA | 30.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 53.8% | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 15.4% | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| ZAIRE | 30.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| LAOS | 8.3% | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| ANGOLA | 72.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| CHILE | 18.2% | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 36.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| ARGENTINA | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| BURUNDI | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| CHAD | 70.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| Senegal | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| SOMALIA | 80.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| BYELORUSSIA (BELARUS) | 22.2% | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| ERITREA | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| GAMBIA | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| KAZAKHSTAN | 11.1% | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| SAUDI ARABIA | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| UGANDA | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| Yemen | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| ARMENIA | 75.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| ITALY | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| KAMPUCHEA | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| UNITED KINGDOM | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| ZIMBABWE | 75.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| UZBEKISTAN | 85.7% | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| GEORGIA | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| JORDAN | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| LITHUANIA | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| PALESTINE | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| KOSOVO | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| LATVIA | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| RWANDA | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| ALGERIA | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| CAMBODIA | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| COSTA RICA | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| ISRAEL | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| PANAMA | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| PORTUGAL | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.