Michael W Straus
This court
Decisiones totales
4857
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
24.8%
Denegaciones
75.2%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Tribunal de inmigración
10 judges · CT
Tasa promedio de aprobación
29.4%
2588 / 8813
Tasa promedio de aprobación
29.4%
Aprobaciones de asilo
2588
Denegaciones
6225
Jueces incluidos
10
Har Immigration Court has 10 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
Perspectiva de la comunidad
Lee experiencias públicas y conversaciones sobre procesos relacionados con Har Immigration Court.
Puedes empezar con estos temas públicos
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
This court
Decisiones totales
4857
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
24.8%
Denegaciones
75.2%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
1755
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
27.6%
Denegaciones
72.4%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
1251
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
43.8%
Denegaciones
56.2%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
554
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
36.5%
Denegaciones
63.5%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
233
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
50.2%
Denegaciones
49.8%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
175
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
52.0%
Denegaciones
48.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
103
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
33.0%
Denegaciones
67.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
96
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
35.4%
Denegaciones
64.6%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
5
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
0.0%
Denegaciones
100.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Very small sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
This court
Decisiones totales
Pendiente
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
Pendiente
Denegaciones
Pendiente
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
Pendiente
No statistics yet
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guatemala | 24.3% | 318 | 993 | 1311 |
| Ecuador | 13.9% | 157 | 973 | 1130 |
| Honduras | 27.4% | 196 | 520 | 716 |
| Brasil | 5.5% | 31 | 533 | 564 |
| El Salvador | 18.3% | 86 | 385 | 471 |
| Haití | 20.5% | 72 | 279 | 351 |
| Colombia | 33.9% | 115 | 224 | 339 |
| ALBANIA | 38.2% | 123 | 199 | 322 |
| China | 41.9% | 135 | 187 | 322 |
| Perú | 23.1% | 66 | 220 | 286 |
| Former Countries | 18.1% | 32 | 145 | 177 |
| Pakistán | 44.1% | 67 | 85 | 152 |
| Nicaragua | 50.7% | 72 | 70 | 142 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 53.9% | 69 | 59 | 128 |
| TURKIYE | 75.0% | 96 | 32 | 128 |
| Venezuela | 68.1% | 79 | 37 | 116 |
| CONGO | 50.0% | 52 | 52 | 104 |
| México | 19.0% | 19 | 81 | 100 |
| India | 18.9% | 18 | 77 | 95 |
| POLAND | 6.7% | 6 | 84 | 90 |
| JAMAICA | 18.3% | 15 | 67 | 82 |
| MACEDONIA | 27.0% | 20 | 54 | 74 |
| Nepal | 62.2% | 46 | 28 | 74 |
| Rusia | 60.6% | 43 | 28 | 71 |
| Bangladés | 54.3% | 38 | 32 | 70 |
| Egipto | 62.5% | 40 | 24 | 64 |
| Nigeria | 50.8% | 32 | 31 | 63 |
| Ghana | 40.0% | 22 | 33 | 55 |
| Ucrania | 49.1% | 26 | 27 | 53 |
| TOGO | 54.3% | 25 | 21 | 46 |
| Irán | 36.6% | 15 | 26 | 41 |
| GUINEA | 57.5% | 23 | 17 | 40 |
| Siria | 80.0% | 32 | 8 | 40 |
| ROMANIA | 17.9% | 7 | 32 | 39 |
| SRI LANKA | 47.2% | 17 | 19 | 36 |
| Cuba | 37.1% | 13 | 22 | 35 |
| LIBERIA | 47.1% | 16 | 18 | 34 |
| LEBANON | 46.7% | 14 | 16 | 30 |
| BELARUS | 96.6% | 28 | 1 | 29 |
| STATELESS - ALIEN UNABLE TO NAME A COUNTRY | 65.5% | 19 | 10 | 29 |
| Afganistán | 67.9% | 19 | 9 | 28 |
| República Dominicana | 16.7% | 4 | 20 | 24 |
| LIBYA | 16.7% | 4 | 20 | 24 |
| Former Countries | 36.4% | 8 | 14 | 22 |
| HUNGARY | 9.1% | 2 | 20 | 22 |
| INDONESIA | 0.0% | 0 | 21 | 21 |
| Camerún | 50.0% | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| Vietnam | 10.0% | 2 | 18 | 20 |
| ZAMBIA | 31.6% | 6 | 13 | 19 |
| BULGARIA | 16.7% | 3 | 15 | 18 |
| IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE) | 38.9% | 7 | 11 | 18 |
| SUDAN | 61.1% | 11 | 7 | 18 |
| AZERBAIJAN | 70.6% | 12 | 5 | 17 |
| Etiopía | 56.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| MOLDAVIA (MOLDOVA) | 56.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| BURKINA FASO | 66.7% | 10 | 5 | 15 |
| Irak | 28.6% | 4 | 10 | 14 |
| PHILIPPINES | 0.0% | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Former Countries | 84.6% | 11 | 2 | 13 |
| KENYA | 30.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 53.8% | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 15.4% | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| ZAIRE | 30.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| LAOS | 8.3% | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| ANGOLA | 72.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| CHILE | 18.2% | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 36.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| ARGENTINA | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| BURUNDI | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| CHAD | 70.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| Senegal | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| SOMALIA | 80.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| BYELORUSSIA (BELARUS) | 22.2% | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| ERITREA | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| GAMBIA | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| KAZAKHSTAN | 11.1% | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| SAUDI ARABIA | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| UGANDA | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| Yemen | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| ARMENIA | 75.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| ITALY | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| KAMPUCHEA | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| UNITED KINGDOM | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| ZIMBABWE | 75.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| UZBEKISTAN | 85.7% | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| GEORGIA | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| JORDAN | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| LITHUANIA | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| PALESTINE | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| KOSOVO | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| LATVIA | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| RWANDA | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| ALGERIA | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| CAMBODIA | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| COSTA RICA | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| ISRAEL | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| PANAMA | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| PORTUGAL | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.