D. William JR. Evans
This court
Total Decisions
1052
Asylum Grant Rate
15.1%
Denials
84.9%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
← Back to all courtsactive active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active
Immigration Court
Cle Immigration Court
د ټولنې بحث · 023 judges · OH
- City / state
- Immigration Court, OH
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Average Asylum Grant Rate
20.3%
2226 / 10957
Average Asylum Grant Rate
20.3%
Asylum grants
2226
Denials
8731
Judges indexed
23
Cle Immigration Court has 23 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
د ټولنې لید
د ټولنې بحث
د Cle Immigration Court په اړه عامه تجربې او د بهیر خبرې ولولئ.
0 موضوعګانې
له دې عامه موضوعاتو پیل کولی شئ
- د عامه بهیر یا چمتووالي تجربه شریکه کړئ
- د عامه معلوماتو د لوستلو په اړه خبرې وکړئ
- پرته له شخصي قضیې جزئیاتو پوښتنه وکړئ
Judges indexed for this court
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
active
Alison M. Brown
This court
Total Decisions
975
Asylum Grant Rate
29.7%
Denials
70.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Michael Tripi
This court
Total Decisions
811
Asylum Grant Rate
14.4%
Denials
85.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Teresa L Riley
This court
Total Decisions
753
Asylum Grant Rate
14.3%
Denials
85.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Monte J Horton
This court
Total Decisions
731
Asylum Grant Rate
20.7%
Denials
79.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Bruce Imbacuan
This court
Total Decisions
657
Asylum Grant Rate
7.6%
Denials
92.4%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Donald Pashayan
This court
Total Decisions
641
Asylum Grant Rate
10.9%
Denials
89.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Thomas Janas
This court
Total Decisions
633
Asylum Grant Rate
17.7%
Denials
82.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Jennifer M Riedthaler-Williams
This court
Total Decisions
609
Asylum Grant Rate
27.3%
Denials
72.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Jonathan W Owens
This court
Total Decisions
466
Asylum Grant Rate
12.9%
Denials
87.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
David C Whipple
This court
Total Decisions
389
Asylum Grant Rate
31.9%
Denials
68.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Patrick Burke
This court
Total Decisions
384
Asylum Grant Rate
7.0%
Denials
93.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Jeremy Santoro
This court
Total Decisions
373
Asylum Grant Rate
15.0%
Denials
85.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Christopher R. Seppanen
This court
Total Decisions
305
Asylum Grant Rate
11.8%
Denials
88.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
James F. III McCarthy
This court
Total Decisions
125
Asylum Grant Rate
15.2%
Denials
84.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Tania T. Nemer
This court
Total Decisions
82
Asylum Grant Rate
28.1%
Denials
72.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Anthony Hurst
This court
Total Decisions
72
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Laura A. Baxter
This court
Total Decisions
53
Asylum Grant Rate
47.2%
Denials
52.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Brandon Kennedy
This court
Total Decisions
14
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Moderate sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Fred J. Guzzo
This court
Total Decisions
3
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Very small sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
James M. Rice
This court
Total Decisions
2
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Very small sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Brandon M. Bolling
This court
Total Decisions
1
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Very small sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
William K. Radin
This court
Total Decisions
1
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Very small sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guatemala | 7.0% | 102 | 1355 | 1457 |
| MAURITANIA | 26.2% | 244 | 686 | 930 |
| El Salvador | 6.5% | 58 | 829 | 887 |
| Honduras | 7.8% | 61 | 722 | 783 |
| Mexico | 2.5% | 19 | 740 | 759 |
| Colombia | 10.1% | 37 | 328 | 365 |
| Nicaragua | 18.2% | 60 | 269 | 329 |
| Brazil | 0.6% | 2 | 316 | 318 |
| Venezuela | 30.4% | 94 | 215 | 309 |
| Russia | 47.1% | 124 | 139 | 263 |
| China | 42.8% | 104 | 139 | 243 |
| Cameroon | 51.6% | 110 | 103 | 213 |
| India | 26.1% | 55 | 156 | 211 |
| GUINEA | 29.9% | 61 | 143 | 204 |
| Senegal | 14.0% | 26 | 160 | 186 |
| UZBEKISTAN | 28.6% | 53 | 132 | 185 |
| Haiti | 5.7% | 10 | 166 | 176 |
| SOMALIA | 39.7% | 62 | 94 | 156 |
| Peru | 6.3% | 9 | 135 | 144 |
| Ukraine | 36.8% | 46 | 79 | 125 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 29.1% | 34 | 83 | 117 |
| Ecuador | 0.0% | 0 | 98 | 98 |
| Ghana | 17.9% | 17 | 78 | 95 |
| Nigeria | 35.6% | 32 | 58 | 90 |
| IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE) | 39.3% | 33 | 51 | 84 |
| CONGO | 31.2% | 24 | 53 | 77 |
| Cuba | 24.0% | 18 | 57 | 75 |
| Egypt | 47.3% | 35 | 39 | 74 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 50.7% | 34 | 33 | 67 |
| ALBANIA | 56.1% | 37 | 29 | 66 |
| Pakistan | 23.1% | 15 | 50 | 65 |
| ERITREA | 66.1% | 41 | 21 | 62 |
| STATELESS - ALIEN UNABLE TO NAME A COUNTRY | 48.4% | 30 | 32 | 62 |
| JORDAN | 27.6% | 16 | 42 | 58 |
| ZIMBABWE | 43.6% | 24 | 31 | 55 |
| KENYA | 16.7% | 9 | 45 | 54 |
| JAMAICA | 3.8% | 2 | 51 | 53 |
| Ethiopia | 44.2% | 23 | 29 | 52 |
| TURKIYE | 60.0% | 30 | 20 | 50 |
| Iraq | 65.3% | 32 | 17 | 49 |
| LEBANON | 42.2% | 19 | 26 | 45 |
| MONGOLIA | 17.8% | 8 | 37 | 45 |
| MALI | 20.5% | 9 | 35 | 44 |
| ARMENIA | 44.2% | 19 | 24 | 43 |
| RWANDA | 61.9% | 26 | 16 | 42 |
| GEORGIA | 19.5% | 8 | 33 | 41 |
| GAMBIA | 22.5% | 9 | 31 | 40 |
| ISRAEL | 21.6% | 8 | 29 | 37 |
| NIGER | 18.9% | 7 | 30 | 37 |
| SUDAN | 47.2% | 17 | 19 | 36 |
| KAZAKHSTAN | 58.8% | 20 | 14 | 34 |
| CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC | 48.3% | 14 | 15 | 29 |
| Iran | 48.3% | 14 | 15 | 29 |
| Dominican Republic | 0.0% | 0 | 28 | 28 |
| MOLDAVIA (MOLDOVA) | 35.7% | 10 | 18 | 28 |
| Syria | 60.7% | 17 | 11 | 28 |
| LIBERIA | 29.6% | 8 | 19 | 27 |
| TANZANIA | 25.9% | 7 | 20 | 27 |
| Former Countries | 32.0% | 8 | 17 | 25 |
| INDONESIA | 16.7% | 4 | 20 | 24 |
| BELARUS | 72.7% | 16 | 6 | 22 |
| BURKINA FASO | 28.6% | 6 | 15 | 21 |
| BURUNDI | 23.8% | 5 | 16 | 21 |
| ESTONIA | 9.5% | 2 | 19 | 21 |
| Afghanistan | 73.7% | 14 | 5 | 19 |
| UGANDA | 36.8% | 7 | 12 | 19 |
| ROMANIA | 11.1% | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| BYELORUSSIA (BELARUS) | 70.6% | 12 | 5 | 17 |
| Former Countries | 64.7% | 11 | 6 | 17 |
| Nepal | 41.2% | 7 | 10 | 17 |
| Bangladesh | 26.7% | 4 | 11 | 15 |
| KUWAIT | 14.3% | 2 | 12 | 14 |
| POLAND | 0.0% | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| TOGO | 50.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| ANGOLA | 7.7% | 1 | 12 | 13 |
| Vietnam | 0.0% | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA | 8.3% | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 16.7% | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| LITHUANIA | 25.0% | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| MOROCCO | 25.0% | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| AZERBAIJAN | 36.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| BHUTAN | 27.3% | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| COSTA RICA | 0.0% | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 18.2% | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| LIBYA | 54.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| ARGENTINA | 70.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| GUINEA BISSAU | 30.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| CHILE | 0.0% | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| BULGARIA | 37.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| CROATIA | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| PALESTINE | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| PORTUGAL | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| SAUDI ARABIA | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| SRI LANKA | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| ZAMBIA | 37.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| CAMBODIA | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| MACEDONIA | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| TURKMENISTAN | 42.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.