Marks, Dana Leigh
This court
Total Decisions
4169
Asylum Grant Rate
66.7%
Denials
33.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
← Back to all courtsactive active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active
Immigration Court
Immigration Court Immigration Court
77 judges · CA
- City / state
- Immigration Court, CA
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Average Asylum Grant Rate
56.7%
49867 / 87891
Average Asylum Grant Rate
56.7%
Asylum grants
49867
Denials
38024
Judges indexed
77
Immigration Court Immigration Court has 77 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
Judges indexed for this court
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
active
Costanzo, Lawrence Di
This court
Total Decisions
2615
Asylum Grant Rate
46.9%
Denials
53.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Geisse, Loreto
This court
Total Decisions
2552
Asylum Grant Rate
67.1%
Denials
32.9%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Deiss, Ila C
This court
Total Decisions
2540
Asylum Grant Rate
89.0%
Denials
11.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
King, Carol A.
This court
Total Decisions
2229
Asylum Grant Rate
64.3%
Denials
35.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Hayward, Miriam
This court
Total Decisions
2115
Asylum Grant Rate
67.0%
Denials
33.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Hornbach, Bernard J.
This court
Total Decisions
1953
Asylum Grant Rate
71.9%
Denials
28.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Greene III, Charles S.
This court
Total Decisions
1788
Asylum Grant Rate
73.8%
Denials
26.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Leadbetter, Philip P.
This court
Total Decisions
1689
Asylum Grant Rate
57.4%
Denials
42.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Gonzalez, Alberto E.
This court
Total Decisions
1642
Asylum Grant Rate
56.0%
Denials
44.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Kirchner, Steven M
This court
Total Decisions
1549
Asylum Grant Rate
52.9%
Denials
47.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
O'Brien, Patrick S
This court
Total Decisions
1445
Asylum Grant Rate
42.9%
Denials
57.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Johnson, Jeremiah
This court
Total Decisions
1434
Asylum Grant Rate
83.5%
Denials
16.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Murry, Anthony S.
This court
Total Decisions
1362
Asylum Grant Rate
8.4%
Denials
91.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Gambill, Scott D
This court
Total Decisions
1288
Asylum Grant Rate
54.5%
Denials
45.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Butler, Jeremy J
This court
Total Decisions
1260
Asylum Grant Rate
69.0%
Denials
31.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
George, Amber D
This court
Total Decisions
1231
Asylum Grant Rate
89.8%
Denials
10.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Daw, Alison E
This court
Total Decisions
1223
Asylum Grant Rate
63.1%
Denials
36.9%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Levine, Shira M
This court
Total Decisions
1206
Asylum Grant Rate
95.0%
Denials
5.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Lyons, Joren
This court
Total Decisions
1189
Asylum Grant Rate
56.4%
Denials
43.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Gordon, Louis A
This court
Total Decisions
1173
Asylum Grant Rate
82.1%
Denials
17.9%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Figueroa, Laura C
This court
Total Decisions
1140
Asylum Grant Rate
52.8%
Denials
47.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Nelson, Julie L
This court
Total Decisions
1126
Asylum Grant Rate
18.2%
Denials
81.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Caborn, Andrew J
This court
Total Decisions
1018
Asylum Grant Rate
24.3%
Denials
75.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Park, Joseph Y
This court
Total Decisions
983
Asylum Grant Rate
47.8%
Denials
52.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Chen, Shuting
This court
Total Decisions
957
Asylum Grant Rate
85.7%
Denials
14.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Griswold, Stephen S.
This court
Total Decisions
941
Asylum Grant Rate
58.5%
Denials
41.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Paulino, Robin K
This court
Total Decisions
855
Asylum Grant Rate
71.3%
Denials
28.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Lake, Kelly B
This court
Total Decisions
783
Asylum Grant Rate
37.0%
Denials
63.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Jefferson-Webb, Lettricea L
This court
Total Decisions
755
Asylum Grant Rate
50.7%
Denials
49.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Ford, Nicholas R
This court
Total Decisions
719
Asylum Grant Rate
47.8%
Denials
52.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Dillon, Chloe S
This court
Total Decisions
681
Asylum Grant Rate
91.2%
Denials
8.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Davis, Howard R
This court
Total Decisions
556
Asylum Grant Rate
76.4%
Denials
23.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Jackson, Jacqueline J
This court
Total Decisions
475
Asylum Grant Rate
79.6%
Denials
20.4%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
McCleskey, Loi L
This court
Total Decisions
426
Asylum Grant Rate
64.5%
Denials
35.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Hoogasian, Amy C.
This court
Total Decisions
424
Asylum Grant Rate
70.3%
Denials
29.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Coupe, Dennis F.
This court
Total Decisions
360
Asylum Grant Rate
31.4%
Denials
68.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Jamil, Rebecca
This court
Total Decisions
356
Asylum Grant Rate
83.4%
Denials
16.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Dinh, Roger H
This court
Total Decisions
333
Asylum Grant Rate
35.7%
Denials
64.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Masterson, Jason R
This court
Total Decisions
288
Asylum Grant Rate
66.3%
Denials
33.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Brasil, Elisa C
This court
Total Decisions
273
Asylum Grant Rate
88.3%
Denials
11.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Begovich, Samantha
This court
Total Decisions
268
Asylum Grant Rate
16.8%
Denials
83.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Kim, Samuel Y
This court
Total Decisions
212
Asylum Grant Rate
91.0%
Denials
9.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Morwood, Dion A.
This court
Total Decisions
187
Asylum Grant Rate
39.6%
Denials
60.4%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Bernstein, Jeffrey J.
This court
Total Decisions
91
Asylum Grant Rate
8.8%
Denials
91.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Nunez, Cynthia M.
This court
Total Decisions
86
Asylum Grant Rate
88.4%
Denials
11.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Larger sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Argumedo, Victoria L.
This court
Total Decisions
22
Asylum Grant Rate
4.5%
Denials
95.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Moderate sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Marks, Dana L.
This court
Total Decisions
3
Asylum Grant Rate
33.3%
Denials
66.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Very small sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
POELLET, KEIRA
This court
Total Decisions
3
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Very small sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Hanrahan, William
This court
Total Decisions
Pending
Asylum Grant Rate
Pending
Denials
Pending
Other Relief Rate
Pending
No statistics yet
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDIA | 62.6% | 11520 | 6879 | 18399 |
| EL SALVADOR | 47.8% | 5593 | 6109 | 11702 |
| GUATEMALA | 63.0% | 6854 | 4033 | 10887 |
| MEXICO | 37.9% | 3521 | 5777 | 9298 |
| CHINA | 65.1% | 2813 | 1506 | 4319 |
| NICARAGUA | 49.0% | 2003 | 2083 | 4086 |
| HONDURAS | 59.2% | 1995 | 1374 | 3369 |
| COLOMBIA | 38.7% | 884 | 1398 | 2282 |
| PERU | 54.7% | 1047 | 867 | 1914 |
| NEPAL | 79.2% | 1487 | 391 | 1878 |
| FIJI | 45.2% | 828 | 1005 | 1833 |
| PHILIPPINES | 16.2% | 210 | 1083 | 1293 |
| ERITREA | 90.7% | 1030 | 105 | 1135 |
| IRAN | 75.8% | 796 | 254 | 1050 |
| RUSSIA | 82.1% | 854 | 186 | 1040 |
| AFGHANISTAN | 79.8% | 699 | 177 | 876 |
| INDONESIA | 48.8% | 427 | 448 | 875 |
| ARMENIA | 55.9% | 444 | 350 | 794 |
| PAKISTAN | 57.3% | 436 | 325 | 761 |
| BRAZIL | 43.5% | 283 | 367 | 650 |
| ETHIOPIA | 81.9% | 503 | 111 | 614 |
| ROMANIA | 64.0% | 359 | 202 | 561 |
| MONGOLIA | 62.3% | 337 | 204 | 541 |
| UKRAINE | 70.8% | 279 | 115 | 394 |
| Former Countries | 60.2% | 234 | 155 | 389 |
| TURKIYE | 77.1% | 253 | 75 | 328 |
| SOMALIA | 80.1% | 261 | 65 | 326 |
| VIETNAM | 34.7% | 109 | 205 | 314 |
| SRI LANKA | 81.5% | 233 | 53 | 286 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 82.1% | 215 | 47 | 262 |
| NIGERIA | 62.4% | 156 | 94 | 250 |
| LAOS | 34.3% | 82 | 157 | 239 |
| VENEZUELA | 76.9% | 180 | 54 | 234 |
| IRAQ | 81.0% | 188 | 44 | 232 |
| KENYA | 75.5% | 163 | 53 | 216 |
| BULGARIA | 62.3% | 129 | 78 | 207 |
| YEMEN | 45.0% | 85 | 104 | 189 |
| JORDAN | 53.8% | 99 | 85 | 184 |
| CAMEROON | 81.1% | 137 | 32 | 169 |
| SYRIA | 80.6% | 133 | 32 | 165 |
| HAITI | 50.6% | 80 | 78 | 158 |
| AZERBAIJAN | 84.3% | 118 | 22 | 140 |
| BELARUS | 82.6% | 114 | 24 | 138 |
| MOLDAVIA (MOLDOVA) | 70.1% | 89 | 38 | 127 |
| CUBA | 32.8% | 40 | 82 | 122 |
| UZBEKISTAN | 72.9% | 86 | 32 | 118 |
| EGYPT | 70.4% | 81 | 34 | 115 |
| STATELESS - ALIEN UNABLE TO NAME A COUNTRY | 78.3% | 83 | 23 | 106 |
| GEORGIA | 65.3% | 62 | 33 | 95 |
| LEBANON | 69.2% | 63 | 28 | 91 |
| KAZAKHSTAN | 75.6% | 68 | 22 | 90 |
| BANGLADESH | 70.2% | 59 | 25 | 84 |
| SUDAN | 91.1% | 72 | 7 | 79 |
| ALGERIA | 69.7% | 53 | 23 | 76 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 83.3% | 55 | 11 | 66 |
| CAMBODIA | 21.9% | 14 | 50 | 64 |
| Former Countries | 69.0% | 40 | 18 | 58 |
| ISRAEL | 55.2% | 32 | 26 | 58 |
| UGANDA | 71.7% | 38 | 15 | 53 |
| CHILE | 49.0% | 25 | 26 | 51 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 51.0% | 26 | 25 | 51 |
| ARGENTINA | 59.2% | 29 | 20 | 49 |
| TUNISIA | 33.3% | 16 | 32 | 48 |
| GHANA | 40.4% | 19 | 28 | 47 |
| FRANCE | 5.1% | 2 | 37 | 39 |
| MOROCCO | 36.8% | 14 | 24 | 38 |
| LIBERIA | 56.8% | 21 | 16 | 37 |
| BYELORUSSIA (BELARUS) | 77.8% | 28 | 8 | 36 |
| POLAND | 54.3% | 19 | 16 | 35 |
| THAILAND | 23.5% | 8 | 26 | 34 |
| KAMPUCHEA | 54.5% | 18 | 15 | 33 |
| ECUADOR | 56.3% | 18 | 14 | 32 |
| GERMANY | 12.9% | 4 | 27 | 31 |
| PANAMA | 27.6% | 8 | 21 | 29 |
| HUNGARY | 39.3% | 11 | 17 | 28 |
| SOUTH KOREA | 32.1% | 9 | 19 | 28 |
| CONGO | 77.8% | 21 | 6 | 27 |
| NIUE | 63.0% | 17 | 10 | 27 |
| ZIMBABWE | 48.1% | 13 | 14 | 27 |
| BELIZE | 65.4% | 17 | 9 | 26 |
| MALAYSIA | 50.0% | 13 | 13 | 26 |
| TURKMENISTAN | 69.2% | 18 | 8 | 26 |
| UNITED KINGDOM | 26.9% | 7 | 19 | 26 |
| SAUDI ARABIA | 60.9% | 14 | 9 | 23 |
| ALBANIA | 76.2% | 16 | 5 | 21 |
| LATVIA | 42.9% | 9 | 12 | 21 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 60.0% | 12 | 8 | 20 |
| BOLIVIA | 52.6% | 10 | 9 | 19 |
| LIBYA | 88.9% | 16 | 2 | 18 |
| SENEGAL | 77.8% | 14 | 4 | 18 |
| KUWAIT | 23.5% | 4 | 13 | 17 |
| CANADA | 12.5% | 2 | 14 | 16 |
| TAIWAN | 31.3% | 5 | 11 | 16 |
| GUINEA | 73.3% | 11 | 4 | 15 |
| JAMAICA | 13.3% | 2 | 13 | 15 |
| COSTA RICA | 71.4% | 10 | 4 | 14 |
| GUADELOUPE | 78.6% | 11 | 3 | 14 |
| IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE) | 71.4% | 10 | 4 | 14 |
| SPAIN | 14.3% | 2 | 12 | 14 |
| BHUTAN | 69.2% | 9 | 4 | 13 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.