Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
73
Grants
1
Denials
72
Grant rate: 1.4%Denial rate: 98.6%
Immigration judge
Amy K Zaske
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
7.9%
25 / 315
Total decisions
315
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
7.9%
Grants: 25
Denial rate
92.1%
Denials: 290
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Amy K.R. Zaske was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Zaske earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1998 from the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities and a Juris Doctor in 2006 from the Mitchell Hamline School of Law. From 2007 to 2023, she was an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Minneapolis – Saint Paul. In 2007, she served as an unemployment law judge at the Department of Employment and Economic Development for the State of Minnesota. Judge Zaske is a member of the Minnesota State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants25 / 315
Denials290 / 315
Other relief0 / 315
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Amy K Zaske.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 73 | 1 | 72 | 1.4% | 98.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 47 | 1 | 46 | 2.1% | 97.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 29 | 3 | 26 | 10.3% | 89.7% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 13 | 4 | 9 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Burundi Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
1
Denials
46
Grant rate: 2.1%Denial rate: 97.9%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
3
Denials
26
Grant rate: 10.3%Denial rate: 89.7%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
0
Denials
18
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Brazil
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Somalia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
4
Denials
9
Grant rate: 30.8%Denial rate: 69.2%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
Romania
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Burundi
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Bermuda
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Peru
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Kyung S Auh
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.3%
- Denial Rate
- 64.7%
M. Audrey Carr
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 24.4%
- Denial Rate
- 75.6%
Susan E. Castro
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 30.2%
- Denial Rate
- 69.8%
Joseph Dierkes
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.9%
- Denial Rate
- 68.0%
Katherine L Hansen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 49.5%
- Denial Rate
- 50.5%
Nathan M. Hansen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 3.9%
- Denial Rate
- 96.2%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.