GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
203
Grants
50
Denials
153
Grant rate: 24.6%Denial rate: 75.4%
Immigration judge
Castro, Susan E.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
30.2%
358 / 1186
Total decisions
1186
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
30.2%
Grants: 358
Denial rate
69.8%
Denials: 828
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants358 / 1186
Denials828 / 1186
Other relief0 / 1186
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 203 | 50 | 153 | 24.6% | 75.4% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 188 | 27 | 161 | 14.4% | 85.6% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 134 | 37 | 97 | 27.6% | 72.4% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 83 | 12 | 71 | 14.5% | 85.5% | View details | |
SOMALIA Larger sample | 57 | 25 | 32 | 43.9% | 56.1% | View details | |
CHINA Larger sample | 56 | 14 | 42 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Larger sample | 40 | 19 | 21 | 47.5% | 52.5% | View details | |
LIBERIA Medium sample | 29 | 9 | 20 | 31.0% | 69.0% | View details | |
IRAQ Medium sample | 24 | 20 | 4 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Medium sample | 23 | 5 | 18 | 21.7% | 78.3% | View details | |
CUBA Medium sample | 22 | 9 | 13 | 40.9% | 59.1% | View details | |
BURMA (MYANMAR) Medium sample | 20 | 15 | 5 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Medium sample | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
KENYA Medium sample | 19 | 15 | 4 | 78.9% | 21.1% | View details | |
NIGERIA Medium sample | 19 | 8 | 11 | 42.1% | 57.9% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 18 | 4 | 14 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
CAMEROON Medium sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
INDIA Medium sample | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
LAOS Medium sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
ERITREA Medium sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details |
View details
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
188
Grants
27
Denials
161
Grant rate: 14.4%Denial rate: 85.6%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
134
Grants
37
Denials
97
Grant rate: 27.6%Denial rate: 72.4%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
83
Grants
12
Denials
71
Grant rate: 14.5%Denial rate: 85.5%
SOMALIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
57
Grants
25
Denials
32
Grant rate: 43.9%Denial rate: 56.1%
CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
56
Grants
14
Denials
42
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
ETHIOPIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
19
Denials
21
Grant rate: 47.5%Denial rate: 52.5%
LIBERIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
9
Denials
20
Grant rate: 31.0%Denial rate: 69.0%
IRAQ
Medium sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
20
Denials
4
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
PAKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
5
Denials
18
Grant rate: 21.7%Denial rate: 78.3%
CUBA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
9
Denials
13
Grant rate: 40.9%Denial rate: 59.1%
BURMA (MYANMAR)
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
15
Denials
5
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
NICARAGUA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
0
Denials
20
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
KENYA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
15
Denials
4
Grant rate: 78.9%Denial rate: 21.1%
NIGERIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
8
Denials
11
Grant rate: 42.1%Denial rate: 57.9%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
4
Denials
14
Grant rate: 22.2%Denial rate: 77.8%
CAMEROON
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Grant rate: 53.3%Denial rate: 46.7%
INDIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
9
Denials
6
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
LAOS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Grant rate: 15.4%Denial rate: 84.6%
ERITREA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.