Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
134
Grants
10
Denials
124
Grant rate: 7.5%Denial rate: 92.5%
Immigration judge
Tamar H Wilson
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
17.5%
154 / 880
Total decisions
880
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
17.5%
Grants: 154
Denial rate
82.5%
Denials: 726
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed Tamar H. Wilson to begin hearingcases in March 2019. Judge Wilson earned a Bachelor of Science in 1998 from the University of Southern Colorado and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from the University of Denver, College of Law.From 2017 to 2018, she served as a district court magistrate for the 18th Judicial District in Centennial, Colorado. From 2015 to 2017, she served as an assistant county attorney at the Arapahoe County Attorney’s Office in Aurora, Colorado. From 2013 to 2015, she served as adeputy district attorney in the special victims unit and general felony prosecutions for the 18th Judicial District in Centennial, Colorado. From 2009 to 2012, she was a staff attorney at the Colorado District Attorneys’ Council, in Denver, Colorado. From 2002 to 2009, she served as adeputy district attorney and a chief deputy district attorney for the 5th Judicial District in Breckenridge, Eagle, Georgetown and Leadville, Colorado. Judge Wilson is a member of the Colorado Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants154 / 880
Denials726 / 880
Other relief0 / 880
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Tamar H Wilson.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 134 | 10 | 124 | 7.5% | 92.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 107 | 9 | 98 | 8.4% | 91.6% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 106 | 7 | 99 | 6.6% | 93.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 90 | 5 | 85 | 5.6% | 94.4% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 57 | 1 | 56 | 1.8% | 98.2% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 43 | 2 | 41 | 4.7% | 95.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 38 | 1 | 37 | 2.6% | 97.4% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 31 | 0 | 31 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 30 | 14 | 16 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 26 | 15 | 11 | 57.7% | 42.3% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 23 | 18 | 5 | 78.3% | 21.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 18 | 5 | 13 | 27.8% | 72.2% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 18 | 14 | 4 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 14 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 13 | 4 | 9 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 13 | 9 | 4 | 69.2% | 30.8% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
107
Grants
9
Denials
98
Grant rate: 8.4%Denial rate: 91.6%
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
106
Grants
7
Denials
99
Grant rate: 6.6%Denial rate: 93.4%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
90
Grants
5
Denials
85
Grant rate: 5.6%Denial rate: 94.4%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
57
Grants
1
Denials
56
Grant rate: 1.8%Denial rate: 98.2%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
2
Denials
41
Grant rate: 4.7%Denial rate: 95.3%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
1
Denials
37
Grant rate: 2.6%Denial rate: 97.4%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
0
Denials
31
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
14
Denials
16
Grant rate: 46.7%Denial rate: 53.3%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
15
Denials
11
Grant rate: 57.7%Denial rate: 42.3%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
18
Denials
5
Grant rate: 78.3%Denial rate: 21.7%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
5
Denials
13
Grant rate: 27.8%Denial rate: 72.2%
Ukraine
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
14
Denials
4
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
5
Denials
9
Grant rate: 35.7%Denial rate: 64.3%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
4
Denials
9
Grant rate: 30.8%Denial rate: 69.2%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
9
Denials
4
Grant rate: 69.2%Denial rate: 30.8%
Dominican Republic
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Bulgaria
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
5
Denials
5
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Uzbekistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria I Akalski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.3%
- Denial Rate
- 95.7%
Richard Bailey
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.8%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Shana W Chen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
David Cheng
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.9%
- Denial Rate
- 79.1%
Henry S. Dogin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.4%
- Denial Rate
- 68.6%
Leo A Finston
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.1%
- Denial Rate
- 60.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.