Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
141
Grants
37
Denials
104
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
39.1%
512 / 1308
Total decisions
1308
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
39.1%
Grants: 512
Denial rate
60.9%
Denials: 796
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Judge Finston in October 2010. Judge Finston received a bachelor of arts degree in 1988 from the City University of New York and a juris doctorate in 1991 from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. From 1997 to October 2010, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Office of the Chief Counsel, Newark, N.J. From 1992 to 1997, he was an asylum officer for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of International Affairs, Newark. Judge Finston is a member of the New Jersey and New York State Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Leo A Finston.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 141 | 37 | 104 | 26.2% | 73.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 135 | 48 | 87 | 35.6% | 64.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 110 | 27 | 83 | 24.5% | 75.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 109 | 26 | 83 | 23.9% | 76.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 64 | 6 | 58 | 9.4% | 90.6% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 64 | 56 | 8 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 54 | 14 | 40 | 25.9% | 74.1% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 48 | 24 | 24 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 39 | 5 | 34 | 12.8% | 87.2% | View details | |
Ghana Sufficient sample | 38 | 18 | 20 | 47.4% | 52.6% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 38 | 26 | 12 | 68.4% | 31.6% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 36 | 11 | 25 | 30.6% | 69.4% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 32 | 7 | 25 | 21.9% | 78.1% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 31 | 25 | 6 | 80.6% | 19.4% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 28 | 1 | 27 | 3.6% | 96.4% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 28 | 20 | 8 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 25 | 2 | 23 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 23 | 15 | 8 | 65.2% | 34.8% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 22 | 13 | 9 | 59.1% | 40.9% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details |
Total decisions
141
Grants
37
Denials
104
Total decisions
135
Grants
48
Denials
87
Total decisions
110
Grants
27
Denials
83
Total decisions
109
Grants
26
Denials
83
Total decisions
64
Grants
6
Denials
58
Total decisions
64
Grants
56
Denials
8
Total decisions
54
Grants
14
Denials
40
Total decisions
48
Grants
24
Denials
24
Total decisions
39
Grants
5
Denials
34
Total decisions
38
Grants
18
Denials
20
Total decisions
38
Grants
26
Denials
12
Total decisions
36
Grants
11
Denials
25
Total decisions
32
Grants
7
Denials
25
Total decisions
31
Grants
25
Denials
6
Total decisions
28
Grants
1
Denials
27
Total decisions
28
Grants
20
Denials
8
Total decisions
25
Grants
2
Denials
23
Total decisions
23
Grants
15
Denials
8
Total decisions
22
Grants
13
Denials
9
Total decisions
15
Grants
9
Denials
6
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.