Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
314
Grants
119
Denials
195
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
43.8%
548 / 1251
Total decisions
1251
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
43.8%
Grants: 548
Denial rate
56.2%
Denials: 703
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Verrillo was appointed as an immigration judge in August 2008. He received a bachelor of arts degree in 1991 from Central Connecticut State University and a juris doctorate in 1995 from the New England School of Law. From February 2001 to August 2008, he served as both the Assistant and Court Administrator for the Immigration Court in Hartford, Conn. From December 2000 to January 2001, Judge Verrillo was a special deputy assistant State's Attorney in Rocky Hill, Conn. From February 1996 to May 2000, he was in private practice. From January 2001 to spring 2005, Judge Verrillo was an adjunct faculty member of New England College of Finance. He is a member of the Connecticut Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Philip Verrillo.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 314 | 119 | 195 | 37.9% | 62.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 185 | 73 | 112 | 39.5% | 60.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 132 | 43 | 89 | 32.6% | 67.4% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 115 | 34 | 81 | 29.6% | 70.4% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 88 | 10 | 78 | 11.4% | 88.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 39 | 30 | 9 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
Turkiye Sufficient sample | 32 | 30 | 2 | 93.8% | 6.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 28 | 10 | 18 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 21 | 10 | 11 | 47.6% | 52.4% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 20 | 6 | 14 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 19 | 7 | 12 | 36.8% | 63.2% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 18 | 11 | 7 | 61.1% | 38.9% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 16 | 13 | 3 | 81.3% | 18.8% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% | 31.3% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Moderate sample | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Stateless — person unable to name a country Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details |
Total decisions
314
Grants
119
Denials
195
Total decisions
185
Grants
73
Denials
112
Total decisions
132
Grants
43
Denials
89
Total decisions
115
Grants
34
Denials
81
Total decisions
88
Grants
10
Denials
78
Total decisions
39
Grants
30
Denials
9
Total decisions
32
Grants
30
Denials
2
Total decisions
28
Grants
10
Denials
18
Total decisions
21
Grants
10
Denials
11
Total decisions
20
Grants
6
Denials
14
Total decisions
19
Grants
7
Denials
12
Total decisions
18
Grants
11
Denials
7
Total decisions
16
Grants
13
Denials
3
Total decisions
16
Grants
11
Denials
5
Total decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
3
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.