Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
287
Grants
44
Denials
243
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
27.6%
485 / 1755
Total decisions
1755
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
27.6%
Grants: 485
Denial rate
72.4%
Denials: 1270
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Morris was appointed as an immigration judge in April 2009. He received a bachelor of science degree in 1976 from the University of Nebraska at Omaha; a juris doctorate in 1981 from Creighton University School of Law; and a master of business administration in 1981 from Creighton University Graduate School. From October 2005 to April 2009, Judge Morris served as an assistant chief counsel, ICE, DHS, in Omaha. From April 2002 to October 2005, he was in private practice in Omaha. From 1987 to 2002, Judge Morris was an assistant U.S. Attorney, also in Omaha. He is a member of the Nebraska Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Daniel A Morris.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 287 | 44 | 243 | 15.3% | 84.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 190 | 22 | 168 | 11.6% | 88.4% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 129 | 6 | 123 | 4.7% | 95.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 124 | 20 | 104 | 16.1% | 83.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 111 | 5 | 106 | 4.5% | 95.5% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 101 | 2 | 99 | 2.0% | 98.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 76 | 14 | 62 | 18.4% | 81.6% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 59 | 48 | 11 | 81.4% | 18.6% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 49 | 10 | 39 | 20.4% | 79.6% | View details | |
Turkiye Sufficient sample | 49 | 38 | 11 | 77.6% | 22.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 45 | 31 | 14 | 68.9% | 31.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 43 | 14 | 29 | 32.6% | 67.4% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 41 | 27 | 14 | 65.9% | 34.1% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 26 | 17 | 9 | 65.4% | 34.6% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 26 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% | 61.5% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 26 | 2 | 24 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 24 | 11 | 13 | 45.8% | 54.2% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 21 | 14 | 7 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 17 | 11 | 6 | 64.7% | 35.3% | View details | |
Burundi Moderate sample | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details |
Total decisions
287
Grants
44
Denials
243
Total decisions
190
Grants
22
Denials
168
Total decisions
129
Grants
6
Denials
123
Total decisions
124
Grants
20
Denials
104
Total decisions
111
Grants
5
Denials
106
Total decisions
101
Grants
2
Denials
99
Total decisions
76
Grants
14
Denials
62
Total decisions
59
Grants
48
Denials
11
Total decisions
49
Grants
10
Denials
39
Total decisions
49
Grants
38
Denials
11
Total decisions
45
Grants
31
Denials
14
Total decisions
43
Grants
14
Denials
29
Total decisions
41
Grants
27
Denials
14
Total decisions
26
Grants
17
Denials
9
Total decisions
26
Grants
10
Denials
16
Total decisions
26
Grants
2
Denials
24
Total decisions
24
Grants
11
Denials
13
Total decisions
21
Grants
14
Denials
7
Total decisions
17
Grants
11
Denials
6
Total decisions
16
Grants
1
Denials
15
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.