Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
214
Grants
64
Denials
150
Grant rate: 29.9%Denial rate: 70.1%
Immigration judge
Gwendylan E Tregerman
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
38.8%
332 / 856
Total decisions
856
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
38.8%
Grants: 332
Denial rate
61.2%
Denials: 524
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Former Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Gwendylan E. Tregerman to begin hearing cases in April 2017. Judge Tregerman earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Stony Brook University in 1992 and a Juris Doctor in 1996 from the Boston University School of Law. From August 2002 to March 2017, she worked for the Office of Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Boston, Mass., serving as deputy chief counsel from 2013 to 2017, senior attorney from 2007 to 2013, and assistant chief counsel from 2002 to 2007. Prior to these roles, she was a staff attorney for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta, Ga., from 1997 to 2000, and served as acting supervisory staff attorney from 2000 to 2001. Judge Tregerman is a member of the New York State Bar, the Massachusetts Bar, and the State Bar of Georgia.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants332 / 856
Denials524 / 856
Other relief0 / 856
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Gwendylan E Tregerman.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 214 | 64 | 150 | 29.9% | 70.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 118 | 31 | 87 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 78 | 15 | 63 | 19.2% | 80.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 68 | 16 | 52 | 23.5% | 76.5% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 52 | 16 | 36 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 25 | 19 | 6 | 76.0% | 24.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 25 | 17 | 8 | 68.0% | 32.0% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 23 | 19 | 4 | 82.6% | 17.4% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 23 | 8 | 15 | 34.8% | 65.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 20 | 1 | 19 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Uganda Moderate sample | 18 | 12 | 6 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 15 | 10 | 5 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belarus Moderate sample | 12 | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
118
Grants
31
Denials
87
Grant rate: 26.3%Denial rate: 73.7%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
78
Grants
15
Denials
63
Grant rate: 19.2%Denial rate: 80.8%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
68
Grants
16
Denials
52
Grant rate: 23.5%Denial rate: 76.5%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
52
Grants
16
Denials
36
Grant rate: 30.8%Denial rate: 69.2%
Angola
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
19
Denials
6
Grant rate: 76.0%Denial rate: 24.0%
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
17
Denials
8
Grant rate: 68.0%Denial rate: 32.0%
Egypt
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
19
Denials
4
Grant rate: 82.6%Denial rate: 17.4%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
8
Denials
15
Grant rate: 34.8%Denial rate: 65.2%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
1
Denials
19
Grant rate: 5.0%Denial rate: 95.0%
Ecuador
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
4
Denials
15
Grant rate: 21.1%Denial rate: 78.9%
Uganda
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
12
Denials
6
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Cameroon
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
10
Denials
5
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
2
Denials
12
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
13
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Belarus
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
11
Denials
1
Grant rate: 91.7%Denial rate: 8.3%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Eritrea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Steven V. Adler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 66.1%
- Denial Rate
- 33.9%
Sarah Cade
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 48.5%
- Denial Rate
- 51.5%
Francis L. Cramer
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.9%
- Denial Rate
- 60.1%
Billino W D'Ambrosio
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.9%
- Denial Rate
- 92.1%
Matthew J. D'Angelo
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 50.7%
- Denial Rate
- 49.3%
Steven F. Day
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 21.8%
- Denial Rate
- 78.2%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.