CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
236
Grants
113
Denials
123
Grant rate: 47.9%Denial rate: 52.1%
Immigration judge
Taylor, John D.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
34.0%
263 / 773
Total decisions
773
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.0%
Grants: 263
Denial rate
66.0%
Denials: 510
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants263 / 773
Denials510 / 773
Other relief0 / 773
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 236 | 113 | 123 | 47.9% | 52.1% | View details | |
ARMENIA Larger sample | 137 | 66 | 71 | 48.2% | 51.8% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 92 | 2 | 90 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
INDONESIA Larger sample | 47 | 7 | 40 | 14.9% | 85.1% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 32 | 5 | 27 | 15.6% | 84.4% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 30 | 1 | 29 | 3.3% | 96.7% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 19 | 7 | 12 | 36.8% | 63.2% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
HONDURAS Medium sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
PHILIPPINES Medium sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
GEORGIA Medium sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
INDIA Medium sample | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
PERU Medium sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
UKRAINE Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
EGYPT Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
SOMALIA Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
NIGERIA Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
SRI LANKA Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details |
View details
ARMENIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
137
Grants
66
Denials
71
Grant rate: 48.2%Denial rate: 51.8%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
92
Grants
2
Denials
90
Grant rate: 2.2%Denial rate: 97.8%
INDONESIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
7
Denials
40
Grant rate: 14.9%Denial rate: 85.1%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
5
Denials
27
Grant rate: 15.6%Denial rate: 84.4%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
1
Denials
29
Grant rate: 3.3%Denial rate: 96.7%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
7
Denials
12
Grant rate: 36.8%Denial rate: 63.2%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
4
Denials
12
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
HONDURAS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Grant rate: 7.7%Denial rate: 92.3%
PHILIPPINES
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
GEORGIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
INDIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
8
Denials
2
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
PERU
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
COLOMBIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
UKRAINE
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
EGYPT
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
PAKISTAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
SOMALIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
NIGERIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
SRI LANKA
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.