India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
221
Grants
132
Denials
89
Grant rate: 59.7%Denial rate: 40.3%
Immigration judge
Jacob J Stender
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
52.6%
285 / 542
Total decisions
542
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
52.6%
Grants: 285
Denial rate
47.4%
Denials: 257
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Jacob J. Stender was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2023. Judge Stender earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2002 from Western Washington University and a Juris Doctor in 2012 from the Seattle University School of Law. From 2020 to 2023, he served as a lead administrative law judge, and from 2017 to 2020, as an administrative law judge, for the Washington State Office of Administrative Hearings. From 2013 to 2017, he served as a district court commissioner for the District Court of Maryland. Judge Stender is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and the Maryland State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants285 / 542
Denials257 / 542
Other relief0 / 542
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jacob J Stender.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 221 | 132 | 89 | 59.7% | 40.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 87 | 7 | 80 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 55 | 36 | 19 | 65.5% | 34.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 40 | 24 | 16 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 17 | 11 | 6 | 64.7% | 35.3% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 16 | 10 | 6 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Laos Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
87
Grants
7
Denials
80
Grant rate: 8.0%Denial rate: 92.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
36
Denials
19
Grant rate: 65.5%Denial rate: 34.5%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
24
Denials
16
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
11
Denials
6
Grant rate: 64.7%Denial rate: 35.3%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
10
Denials
6
Grant rate: 62.5%Denial rate: 37.5%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Grant rate: 54.5%Denial rate: 45.5%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
10
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Colombia
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Egypt
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
Romania
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Grant rate: 85.7%Denial rate: 14.3%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
Brazil
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Venezuela
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Angola
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Laos
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Lauren M. Black
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Lisa M. Calero
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Florence A Chamberlin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 69.6%
- Denial Rate
- 30.4%
Colin P Eichenberger
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.7%
- Denial Rate
- 64.3%
John F. Jakubowski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Stephen F. Keane
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.