Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
207
Grants
44
Denials
163
Grant rate: 21.3%Denial rate: 78.7%
Immigration judge
Pallavi S Shirole
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
26.1%
255 / 978
Total decisions
978
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
26.1%
Grants: 255
Denial rate
73.9%
Denials: 723
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Pallavi S. Shirole to begin hearing cases in October 2019. Judge Shirole earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2006 from the University of Maryland, College Park, and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from University of Baltimore School of Law. From 2017 to 2019, she served as an associate legal advisor for the National Security Law Section, Office ofthe Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Departmentof Homeland Security (DHS), in the District of Columbia. From 2016 to 2017, she served as anassistant chief counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, OPLA, ICE, DHS, in Portland, Oregon.From 2015 to 2017, she directed the Law & Leadership Program at Frederick Douglass High School, in Baltimore. From 2010 to 2015, she served as an assistant state’s attorney for the Office of the State’s Attorney, in Baltimore. Judge Shirole is a member of the Maryland State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants255 / 978
Denials723 / 978
Other relief0 / 978
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Pallavi S Shirole.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 207 | 44 | 163 | 21.3% | 78.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 129 | 22 | 107 | 17.1% | 82.9% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 110 | 22 | 88 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 108 | 26 | 82 | 24.1% | 75.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 104 | 19 | 85 | 18.3% | 81.7% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 43 | 26 | 17 | 60.5% | 39.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 25 | 11 | 14 | 44.0% | 56.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 19 | 7 | 12 | 36.8% | 63.2% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 17 | 11 | 6 | 64.7% | 35.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 17 | 2 | 15 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
129
Grants
22
Denials
107
Grant rate: 17.1%Denial rate: 82.9%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
110
Grants
22
Denials
88
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
108
Grants
26
Denials
82
Grant rate: 24.1%Denial rate: 75.9%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
104
Grants
19
Denials
85
Grant rate: 18.3%Denial rate: 81.7%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
26
Denials
17
Grant rate: 60.5%Denial rate: 39.5%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
11
Denials
14
Grant rate: 44.0%Denial rate: 56.0%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
7
Denials
12
Grant rate: 36.8%Denial rate: 63.2%
Cameroon
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
11
Denials
6
Grant rate: 64.7%Denial rate: 35.3%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
2
Denials
15
Grant rate: 11.8%Denial rate: 88.2%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
Singapore
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Guinea
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria I Akalski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.3%
- Denial Rate
- 95.7%
Richard Bailey
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.8%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Shana W Chen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
David Cheng
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.9%
- Denial Rate
- 79.1%
Henry S. Dogin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.4%
- Denial Rate
- 68.6%
Leo A Finston
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.1%
- Denial Rate
- 60.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.